The BN_GF2m_mod_inv function in crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0e, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 24.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.8% of all records.
- Fixed version: openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2b-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u17; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.2b-1; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u17; openssl (Debian:8) 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The BN_GF2m_mod_inv function in crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0e, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2b does not properly handle ECParameters structures in which the curve is over a malformed binary polynomial field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a session that uses an Elliptic Curve algorithm, as demonstrated by an attack against a server that supports client authentication.
- Published
- Jun 12, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 24.2% · 97th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-399
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 7 / 30 · 24.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl opensslup to 0.9.8zf inclusive
- openssl openssl1.0.0
- openssl openssl1.0.0a
- openssl openssl1.0.0b
- openssl openssl1.0.0c
- openssl openssl1.0.0d
- openssl openssl1.0.0e
- openssl openssl1.0.0f
- openssl openssl1.0.0g
- openssl openssl1.0.0h
- openssl openssl1.0.0i
- openssl openssl1.0.0j
- openssl openssl1.0.0k
- openssl openssl1.0.0l
- openssl openssl1.0.0m
- openssl openssl1.0.0n
- openssl openssl1.0.0o
- openssl openssl1.0.0p
- openssl openssl1.0.0q
- openssl openssl1.0.0r
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 1.0.2b-1 | 1.0.2b-1 |
| Debian:7 | openssl | before 1.0.1e-2+deb7u17 | 1.0.1e-2+deb7u17 |
| Debian:8 | openssl | before 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1 | 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | compat-openssl098 | before 0.9.8j-78.1 | 0.9.8j-78.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | openssl | before 1.0.1i-25.1 | 1.0.1i-25.1 |
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code 65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-4000May 20, 2015 · The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_E60This week
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-8176Jun 12, 2015 · The dtls1_clear_queues function in ssl/d1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h frees data structure35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2015-1789Jun 12, 2015 · The X509_cmp_time function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zg, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0s, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1n, and 1.0.2 before 153Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:openssl | 1.0.2b-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:compat-openssl098 | 0.9.8j-78.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl | 1.0.1i-25.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2023-11-03 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+3065 d
- TodayOct 20, 2026+4148 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015
- ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc
- kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10694
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00023.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00024.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00026.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00003.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00004.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00006.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00007.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143880121627664&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2
- tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150612-openssl
- www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21960041
- www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3287
- www.fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-06-11-fortinet-vulnerability-openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.