CVE-2015-0288: The X509_to_X509_REQ function in crypto/x509/x509_req.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 8.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 95% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.1k-2; openssl (Debian:6.0) 0.9.8o-4squeeze20; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u15.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Debian:12) 1.0.1k-2; openssl (Debian:6.0) 0.9.8o-4squeeze20; openssl (Debian:7) 1.0.1e-2+deb7u15 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The X509_to_X509_REQ function in crypto/x509/x509_req.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid certificate key.
- Published
- Mar 19, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 8.3% · 95th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
22
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 8.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your server's TLS configurationRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openssl opensslup to 0.9.8ze inclusive
- openssl openssl1.0.0
- openssl openssl1.0.0a
- openssl openssl1.0.0b
- openssl openssl1.0.0c
- openssl openssl1.0.0d
- openssl openssl1.0.0e
- openssl openssl1.0.0f
+12 more rows
- openssl openssl1.0.0g
- openssl openssl1.0.0h
- openssl openssl1.0.0i
- openssl openssl1.0.0j
- openssl openssl1.0.0k
- openssl openssl1.0.0l
- openssl openssl1.0.0m
- openssl openssl1.0.0n
- openssl openssl1.0.0o
- openssl openssl1.0.0p
- openssl openssl1.0.0q
- openssl openssl1.0.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 1.0.1k-2 | 1.0.1k-2 |
| Debian:6.0 | openssl | before 0.9.8o-4squeeze20 | 0.9.8o-4squeeze20 |
| Debian:7 | openssl | before 1.0.1e-2+deb7u15 | 1.0.1e-2+deb7u15 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | libressl | before 2.5.0-1.1 | 2.5.0-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | openssl | before 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 | 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 | 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | openssl-perl | before 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 | 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | openssl-devel | before 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 | 0:0.9.8e-33.el5_11 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl | before 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 | 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 | 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-devel | before 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 | 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-perl | before 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 | 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | openssl-static | before 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 | 0:1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-devel | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-libs | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-perl | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | openssl-static | before 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.el7_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | openssl | before 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | openssl-debuginfo | before 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | openssl-devel | before 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | openssl-libs | before 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::server | openssl-perl | before 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 | 1:1.0.1e-42.ael7b_1.4 |
+66
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-0286Mar 19, 2015 · The ASN1_TYPE_cmp function in crypto/asn1/a_type.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before…26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2015-0287Mar 19, 2015 · The ASN1_item_ex_d2i function in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2…23Monitor
- Later →CVE-2015-0289Mar 19, 2015 · The PKCS#7 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly…23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:openssl | 1.0.1k-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:libressl | 2.5.0-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_bmx | 0:0.9.5-5.GA.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_bmx-debuginfo | 0:0.9.5-5.GA.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster | 0:1.3.1-8.Final_redhat_3.1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-tomcat7 | 0:1.3.1-8.Final_redhat_3.1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-tomcat8 | 0:1.3.1-8.Final_redhat_3.1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_jk | 0:1.2.40-8.redhat_1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_jk-ap24 | 0:1.2.40-8.redhat_1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_jk-debuginfo | 0:1.2.40-8.redhat_1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_jk-manual | 0:1.2.40-8.redhat_1.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_security-jws3 | 0:2.8.0-6.GA.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_security-jws3-debuginfo | 0:2.8.0-6.GA.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:tomcat7 | 0:7.0.59-26_patch_00.ep7.el7 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:3.0::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:compat-openssl098 | 0.9.8j-73.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:mysql | 5.5.46-0.14.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:openssl | 1.0.1i-20.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152733.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152734.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/152844.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/156823.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-May/157177.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00022.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-03/msg00062.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142841429220765&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143213830203296&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143748090628601&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050155601375&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050254401665&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144050297101809&w=2
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0715.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0716.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.