CVE-2015-0250: XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the SVG to (1) PNG and (2) JPG conversion classes in Apache Batik 1.x before 1.8 allows remote at
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 16.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: batik (Debian:12) 1.7+dfsg-5; batik (Debian:6.0) 1.7-6+deb6u1; batik (Debian:7) 1.7+dfsg-3+deb7u1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to batik (Debian:12) 1.7+dfsg-5; batik (Debian:6.0) 1.7-6+deb6u1; batik (Debian:7) 1.7+dfsg-3+deb7u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the SVG to (1) PNG and (2) JPG conversion classes in Apache Batik 1.x before 1.8 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service via a crafted SVG file.
- Published
- Mar 24, 2015
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 16.5% · 97th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 5 / 30 · 16.5%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | batik | cpe:2.3:a:apache:batik |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| redhat | jboss enterprise brms platform | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_brms_platform |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache batikup to 1.7 inclusive
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux14.10
- redhat jboss enterprise brms platformup to 6.1.2 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | batik | before 1.7+dfsg-5 | 1.7+dfsg-5 |
| Debian:6.0 | batik | before 1.7-6+deb6u1 | 1.7-6+deb6u1 |
| Debian:7 | batik | before 1.7+dfsg-3+deb7u1 | 1.7+dfsg-3+deb7u1 |
| Maven | org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik | from 1.0 · before 1.8 | 1.8 |
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-8013In Apache Batik 1.x before 1.10, when deserializing subclass of `AbstractDocument`, the class takes a string from the inputStream as the cla45Plan
- CVE-2020-11987Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel.36Monitor
- CVE-2019-17566Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes.33Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2005-0508Mar 14, 2005 · Unknown vulnerability in Squiggle for Batik before 1.5.1 allows attackers to bypass certain access controls via certain features of the Rhin18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2017-5662Apr 18, 2017 · In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send malicio30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-38398Sep 22, 2022 · Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:batik | 1.7+dfsg-5 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik | 1.8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3205
- advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2015-0138.html
- packetstormsecurity.com/files/130964/Apache-Batik-XXE-Injection.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0041.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0042.html
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:203
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1032781
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2548-1
- xmlgraphics.apache.org/security.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.