Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2014-9666· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The tt_sbit_decoder_init function in sfnt/ttsbit.c in FreeType before 2.5.4 proceeds with a count-to-size association without restricting th

The tt_sbit_decoder_init function in sfnt/ttsbit.c in FreeType before 2.5.4 proceeds with a count-to-size association without restricting the count value, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted embedded bitmap.

MediumCVSS 6.8 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 8, 2015
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.2% · 91th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

28

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.2%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
freetypefreetype
opensuseopensuse
oraclesolaris
canonicalubuntu linux
debiandebian linux
redhatenterprise linux desktop
redhatenterprise linux hpc node
redhatenterprise linux hpc node eus
redhatenterprise linux server
redhatenterprise linux server eus
redhatenterprise linux workstation
fedoraprojectfedora

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux10.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux12.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux14.10
  • canonical ubuntu linux15.04
  • debian debian linux7.0
  • fedoraproject fedora20
  • fedoraproject fedora21
  • freetype freetypeup to 2.5.3 inclusive
  • opensuse opensuse13.1
  • opensuse opensuse13.2
  • oracle solaris10.0
  • oracle solaris11.2
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux hpc node6
  • redhat enterprise linux hpc node7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux hpc node eus7.1
  • redhat enterprise linux server6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux server7.0

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12freetypebefore 2.5.2-32.5.2-3
Debian:6.0freetypebefore 2.4.2-2.1+squeeze52.4.2-2.1+squeeze5
Debian:7freetypebefore 2.4.9-1.1+deb7u12.4.9-1.1+deb7u1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12freetype2before 2.5.3-5.12.5.3-5.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12ft2demosbefore 2.5.3-5.12.5.3-5.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-27363An out of bounds write exists in FreeType versions 2.13.0 and below (newer versions of FreeType are not vulnerable) when attempting to parseKEV
    70This week
  • CVE-2012-1126FreeType before 2.4.9, as used in Mozilla Firefox Mobile before 10.0.4 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of serv
    42Plan
  • CVE-2022-27404FreeType commit 1e2eb65048f75c64b68708efed6ce904c31f3b2f was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow via the function sfnt_init_face.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2015-9290In FreeType before 2.6.1, a buffer over-read occurs in type1/t1parse.c on function T1_Get_Private_Dict where there is no check that the new
    40Plan
  • CVE-2017-8287FreeType 2 before 2017-03-26 has an out-of-bounds write caused by a heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_builder_close_contour funct
    40Plan
  • CVE-2017-8105FreeType 2 before 2017-03-24 has an out-of-bounds write caused by a heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_decoder_parse_charstrings f
    40Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:freetype2.5.2-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
suse:freetype22.5.3-5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)
suse:ft2demos2.5.3-5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    P · data can be read
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    P · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    P
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    P

    Weakness class (CWE)

    CWE-189 · Numeric Errors

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

    nvd-primary

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records