CVE-2013-6425: Integer underflow in the pixman_trapezoid_valid macro in pixman.h in Pixman before 0.32.0, as used in X.Org server and cairo, allows context
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.9% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: pixman (Debian:12) 0.30.2-2; pixman (Debian:6.0) 0.16.4-1+deb6u1; pixman (Debian:7) 0.26.0-4+deb7u1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to pixman (Debian:12) 0.30.2-2; pixman (Debian:6.0) 0.16.4-1+deb6u1; pixman (Debian:7) 0.26.0-4+deb7u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Integer underflow in the pixman_trapezoid_valid macro in pixman.h in Pixman before 0.32.0, as used in X.Org server and cairo, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a negative bottom value.
- Published
- Jan 18, 2014
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.8% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-191
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| pixman | pixman | cpe:2.3:a:pixman:pixman |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server tus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_tus |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux12.04
- canonical ubuntu linux12.10
- canonical ubuntu linux13.04
- canonical ubuntu linux13.10
- debian debian linux6.0
- debian debian linux7.0
- opensuse opensuse11.4
- opensuse opensuse12.2
- opensuse opensuse12.3
- opensuse opensuse13.1
- pixman pixmanbefore 0.32.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop5.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux eus6.5
- redhat enterprise linux server5.0
- redhat enterprise linux server6.0
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.5
- redhat enterprise linux server tus6.5
- redhat enterprise linux workstation5.0
- redhat enterprise linux workstation6.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | pixman | before 0.30.2-2 | 0.30.2-2 |
| Debian:6.0 | pixman | before 0.16.4-1+deb6u1 | 0.16.4-1+deb6u1 |
| Debian:7 | pixman | before 0.26.0-4+deb7u1 | 0.26.0-4+deb7u1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pixman | before 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pixman-debuginfo | before 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | pixman-devel | before 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pixman | before 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 | 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pixman-debuginfo | before 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 | 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | pixman-devel | before 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 | 0:0.26.2-5.1.el6_5 |
Same product
pixman: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-9766Integer overflow in the create_bits function in pixman-bits-image.c in Pixman before 0.32.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of ser41Plan
- CVE-2015-5297An integer overflow issue has been reported in the general_composite_rect() function in pixman prior to version 0.32.8.39Monitor
- CVE-2022-44638In libpixman in Pixman before 0.42.2, there is an out-of-bounds write (aka heap-based buffer overflow) in rasterize_edges_8 due to an intege36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2013-6424Jan 18, 2014 · Integer underflow in the xTrapezoidValid macro in render/picture.h in X.Org allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service 21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-37769Jul 17, 2023 · stress-test master commit e4c878 was discovered to contain a FPE vulnerability via the component combine_inner at /pixman-combine-float.c.26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:pixman | 0.30.2-2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pixman | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pixman-debuginfo | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:pixman-devel | 0:0.22.0-2.2.el5_10 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-191 · Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (12 more)Show less
- lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2013-November/003109.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00008.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00097.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1869.html
- www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2823
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/12/03/8
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/12/04/8
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2047-1
- bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67484
- bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1197921
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.