The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python module unsafely, whi
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Because a ready-made attack tool exists, priority is at least “Plan”.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 38.6% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 98.5% of all records.
- Fixed version: graphite-web (Debian:12) 0.9.12+debian-1; graphite-web (PyPI) 0.9.11.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to graphite-web (Debian:12) 0.9.12+debian-1; graphite-web (PyPI) 0.9.11 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python module unsafely, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized object.
- Published
- Sep 27, 2013
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 38.6% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Report tools
Action score
40
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 12 / 30 · 38.6%
- Ready-made attack tool
- 1 / 40 · floor: at least 40
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Weaponized exploit exists
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| graphite project | graphite | cpe:2.3:a:graphite_project:graphite |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- graphite project graphite0.9.10
- graphite project graphite0.9.5
- graphite project graphite0.9.6
- graphite project graphite0.9.7
- graphite project graphite0.9.8
- graphite project graphite0.9.9
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | graphite-web | before 0.9.12+debian-1 | 0.9.12+debian-1 |
| PyPI | graphite-web | from 0.9.5 · before 0.9.11 | 0.9.11 |
Same product
graphite project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-18638send_email in graphite-web/webapp/graphite/composer/views.py in Graphite through 1.1.5 is vulnerable to SSRF.35Monitor
- CVE-2026-50593Graphite before 1.3.15 has an integer underflow and resultant out-of-bounds write via Graphite actions, because slotat does not ensure that 29Monitor
- CVE-2013-5942Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python module unsafely, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted 28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2013-5943Sep 27, 2013 · Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Graphite before 0.9.11 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML 18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-4728Dec 27, 2022 · Graphite Web Cookie cross site scripting21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2022-4729Dec 27, 2022 · Graphite Web Template Name cross site scripting21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:graphite-web | 0.9.12+debian-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:graphite-web | 0.9.11 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2013-08-21 |
| Metasploit module | exploit/unix/webapp/graphite_pickle_execGraphite Web Unsafe Pickle Handlingexploit | 2013-08-20 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploit-38 d
- First PoC-37 d
- Published
- TodayOct 22, 2026+4773 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.