Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2013-4282· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Stack-based buffer overflow in the reds_handle_ticket function in server/reds.c in SPICE 0.12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of

Stack-based buffer overflow in the reds_handle_ticket function in server/reds.c in SPICE 0.12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long password in a SPICE ticket.

MediumCVSS 5.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 2, 2013
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.7% · 86th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.7%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
spice projectspice
redhatenterprise virtualization
redhatenterprise linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • redhat enterprise linux5
  • redhat enterprise linux6.0
  • redhat enterprise virtualization3.0
  • spice project spice0.12.0

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12spicebefore 0.12.4-0nocelt20.12.4-0nocelt2
Debian:7spicebefore 0.11.0-1+deb7u10.11.0-1+deb7u1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedspicebefore 0.15.0-1.30.15.0-1.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientqspicebefore 0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.10:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientqspice-debuginfobefore 0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.10:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientqspice-libsbefore 0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.10:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientspice-serverbefore 0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.50:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientspice-server-debuginfobefore 0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.50:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientspice-server-develbefore 0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.50:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorrhev-hypervisor6before 0:6.4-20131016.0.el6_40:6.4-20131016.0.el6_4
Red Hat:rhel_virtualization:5::clientqspice-libs-develbefore 0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.10:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12spicebefore 0.12.4-6.10.12.4-6.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-10893Multiple integer overflow and buffer overflow issues were discovered in spice-client's handling of LZ compressed frames.
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2018-10873A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before version 0.14.1 where the generated code used for demarshalling messages lacked sufficient bou
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2016-9577A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before 0.13.90 in the server's protocol handling.
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2017-7506spice versions though 0.13 are vulnerable to out-of-bounds memory access when processing specially crafted messages from authenticated attac
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2016-9578A vulnerability was discovered in SPICE before 0.13.90 in the server's protocol handling.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2019-3813Spice, versions 0.5.2 through 0.14.1, are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read due to an off-by-one error in memslot_get_virt.
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:spice0.12.4-0nocelt2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:spice0.15.0-1.3 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:qspice0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:qspice-debuginfo0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:qspice-libs0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:qspice-libs-devel0:0.3.0-56.el5_10.1 · Red Hat:rhel_virtualization:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:rhev-hypervisor60:6.4-20131016.0.el6_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::hypervisorPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:spice-server0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:spice-server-debuginfo0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:spice-server-devel0:0.12.0-12.el6_4.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
suse:spice0.12.4-6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
P · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
P

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records