Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2013-4213· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by the EJB client API, which allows remote

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.5% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 84.5% of all records.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: jboss-as-client-all (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el5; jboss-ejb-client (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el5; jboss-remote-naming (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el5.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to jboss-as-client-all (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el5; jboss-ejb-client (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el5; jboss-remote-naming (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5) 0:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el5 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by the EJB client API, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using an EJB client.

MediumCVSS 6.4 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Aug 16, 2013
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.5% · 85th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

26

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
25 / 40 · 6.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.5%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2013-4213

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Port scanning: 5 full scans a day (members only)
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Verify your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for redhat records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
redhatjboss enterprise application platform

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • redhat jboss enterprise application platform6.1.0

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5jboss-as-client-allbefore 0:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el50:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el5
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5jboss-ejb-clientbefore 0:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el50:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el5
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5jboss-remote-namingbefore 0:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el50:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el5
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el6jboss-as-client-allbefore 0:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el60:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el6
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el6jboss-ejb-clientbefore 0:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el60:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el6
Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el6jboss-remote-namingbefore 0:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el60:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el6

Same product

redhat: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-12149In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnKEV
    96Now
  • CVE-2010-1871JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for KEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2010-1428The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09KEV
    78This week
  • CVE-2010-0738The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 aKEV
    75This week
  • CVE-2016-2183The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of appr
    58Plan
  • CVE-2017-7504HTTPServerILServlet.java in JMS over HTTP Invocation Layer of the JbossMQ implementation, which is enabled by default in Red Hat Jboss Appli
    51Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
red hat:jboss-as-client-all0:7.2.0-9.Final_redhat_9.ep6.el5 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jboss-ejb-client0:1.0.21-2.Final_redhat_2.ep6.el5 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jboss-remote-naming0:1.0.6-3.Final_redhat_3.ep6.el5 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6::el5Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
P · data can be read
Integrity
P · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
P
Integrity impact
P
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-284 · Improper Access Control

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (7 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records