Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2013-2724· NVD / CVE Program· CNA adobe

Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.5, 10.x before 10.1.7, and 11.x before 11.0.03 allows attackers to ex

Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.5, 10.x before 10.1.7, and 11.x before 11.0.03 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

CriticalCVSS 10.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 16, 2013
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
8.6% · 95th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

43

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
3 / 30 · 8.6%

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
adobeacrobat reader
adobeacrobat

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • adobe acrobat10.0
  • adobe acrobat10.0.1
  • adobe acrobat10.0.2
  • adobe acrobat10.0.3
  • adobe acrobat10.1
  • adobe acrobat10.1.1
  • adobe acrobat10.1.2
  • adobe acrobat10.1.3
  • adobe acrobat10.1.4
  • adobe acrobat10.1.5
  • adobe acrobat10.1.6
  • adobe acrobat11.0
  • adobe acrobat11.0.1
  • adobe acrobat11.0.2
  • adobe acrobat9.0
  • adobe acrobat9.1
  • adobe acrobat9.1.1
  • adobe acrobat9.1.2
  • adobe acrobat9.1.3
  • adobe acrobat9.2

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::serveracroreadbefore 0:9.5.5-1.el5_90:9.5.5-1.el5_9
Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::serveracroread-pluginbefore 0:9.5.5-1.el5_90:9.5.5-1.el5_9
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6acroreadbefore 0:9.5.5-1.el6_40:9.5.5-1.el6_4
Red Hat:rhel_extras:6acroread-pluginbefore 0:9.5.5-1.el6_40:9.5.5-1.el6_4

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2009-0927Stack-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat 9 before 9.1, 8 before 8.1.3 , and 7 before 7.1.1 allows remote attackers to eKEV
    94Now
  • CVE-2013-2730Buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.5.5, 10.x before 10.1.7, and 11.x before 11.0.03 allows attackers to execute arbitr
    64This week
  • CVE-2010-1240Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.3.3, and 8.x before 8.2.3 on Windows and Mac OS X, do not restrict the contents of one text field in t
    59Plan
  • CVE-2011-0593Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.0.1, 9.x before 9.4.2, and 8.x before 8.2.6 on Windows and Mac OS X allow remote attackers to execut
    52Plan
  • CVE-2011-0592Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.0.1, 9.x before 9.4.2, and 8.x before 8.2.6 on Windows and Mac OS X allow remote attackers to execut
    51Plan
  • CVE-2011-0591Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.0.1, 9.x before 9.4.2, and 8.x before 8.2.6 on Windows and Mac OS X allow remote attackers to execut
    51Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
red hat:acroread0:9.5.5-1.el5_9 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::serverPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:acroread-plugin0:9.5.5-1.el5_9 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::serverPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
C · data can be read
Integrity
C · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
C · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
C
Integrity impact
C
Availability impact
C

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

nvd-primary

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records