Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2013-2033· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.514, LTS before 1.509.1, and Enterprise 1.466.x before 1.466.14.1 and 1.480.x b

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.514, LTS before 1.509.1, and Enterprise 1.466.x before 1.466.14.1 and 1.480.x before 1.480.4.1 allows remote authenticated users with write permission to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

LowCVSS 2.1 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 10, 2014
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.9% · 79th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

9

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 1.9%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
jenkinsjenkins
cloudbeesjenkins

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • cloudbees jenkins1.466 and later · before 1.466.14.1
  • cloudbees jenkins1.480 and later · before 1.480.4.1
  • jenkins jenkinsbefore 1.509.1
  • jenkins jenkinsbefore 1.514

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-corefrom 1.513 · before 1.5141.514
Mavenorg.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-corebefore 1.509.11.509.1
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6atlasbefore 0:3.8.4-2.el60:3.8.4-2.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6atlas-debuginfobefore 0:3.8.4-2.el60:3.8.4-2.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6atlas-develbefore 0:3.8.4-2.el60:3.8.4-2.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6blas-develbefore 0:3.2.1-4.el60:3.2.1-4.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6facterbefore 0:1.6.6-1.el6op0:1.6.6-1.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gdbefore 0:2.0.35-11.el60:2.0.35-11.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gd-debuginfobefore 0:2.0.35-11.el60:2.0.35-11.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gd-develbefore 0:2.0.35-11.el60:2.0.35-11.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gdbmbefore 0:1.8.0-36.el60:1.8.0-36.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gdbm-debuginfobefore 0:1.8.0-36.el60:1.8.0-36.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6gdbm-develbefore 0:1.8.0-36.el60:1.8.0-36.el6
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6geosbefore 0:3.3.1-1.el6op0:3.3.1-1.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6geos-debuginfobefore 0:3.3.1-1.el6op0:3.3.1-1.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6geos-develbefore 0:3.3.1-1.el6op0:3.3.1-1.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ghostscriptbefore 0:8.70-15.el6_4.10:8.70-15.el6_4.1
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ghostscript-debuginfobefore 0:8.70-15.el6_4.10:8.70-15.el6_4.1
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ghostscript-develbefore 0:8.70-15.el6_4.10:8.70-15.el6_4.1
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ghostscript-docbefore 0:8.70-15.el6_4.10:8.70-15.el6_4.1
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6haproxybefore 0:1.4.22-5.el6op0:1.4.22-5.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6haproxy-debuginfobefore 0:1.4.22-5.el6op0:1.4.22-5.el6op
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ImageMagickbefore 0:6.5.4.7-6.el6_20:6.5.4.7-6.el6_2
Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6ImageMagick-debuginfobefore 0:6.5.4.7-6.el6_20:6.5.4.7-6.el6_2

+96

Same product

jenkins: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-23897Jenkins 2.441 and earlier, LTS 2.426.2 and earlier does not disable a feature of its CLI command parser that replaces an '@' character folloKEV
    99Now
  • CVE-2017-1000353Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote code execution.KEV
    99Now
  • CVE-2018-1000861A code execution vulnerability exists in the Stapler web framework used by Jenkins 2.153 and earlier, LTS 2.138.3 and earlier in stapler/corKEV
    98Now
  • CVE-2016-9299The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized
    68This week
  • CVE-2015-5317The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive job and build name inKEV
    67This week
  • CVE-2015-8103The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ser
    65This week

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Maven:org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core1.509.1Package registry (OSV)
Maven:org.jenkins-ci.main:jenkins-core1.514Package registry (OSV)
red hat:js0:1.70-12.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:js-debuginfo0:1.70-12.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:js-devel0:1.70-12.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:mod_passenger0:3.0.17-2.el6op.1 · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-RMagick0:2.13.1-6.el6op.1 · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-RMagick-debuginfo0:2.13.1-6.el6op.1 · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-RMagick-doc0:2.13.1-6.el6op.1 · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby193-js1:1.8.5-10.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby193-js-debuginfo1:1.8.5-10.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby193-js-devel1:1.8.5-10.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-open40:1.3.0-2.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:rubygem-open4-doc0:1.3.0-2.el6op · Red Hat:openshift:1.2::el6Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
P · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack complexity
High
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
P
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

nvd-primary

Root cause

User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-79 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;

Fixed

ts
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records