Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2013-1897· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

The do_search function in ldap/servers/slapd/search.c in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x before 1.2.11.20 and 1.3.x before 1.3.0.5 does not prope

The do_search function in ldap/servers/slapd/search.c in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x before 1.2.11.20 and 1.3.x before 1.3.0.5 does not properly restrict access to entries when the nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access configuration is set to rootdse and the BASE search scope is used, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information outside of the rootDSE via a crafted LDAP search.

LowCVSS 2.6 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 13, 2013
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.1% · 81th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

11

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
10 / 40 · 2.6 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.1%

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
fedoraproject389 directory server

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.1
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.10
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.10.11
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.10.2
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.10.3
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.10.4
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.1
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.10
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.11
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.12
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.13
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.14
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.15
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.17
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.19
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.5
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.6
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.8
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.11.9
  • fedoraproject 389 directory server1.2.2

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12389-ds-basebefore 1.3.2.9-11.3.2.9-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client389-ds-basebefore 0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_40:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client389-ds-base-debuginfobefore 0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_40:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client389-ds-base-develbefore 0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_40:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client389-ds-base-libsbefore 0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_40:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-7551389-ds-base version before 1.3.5.19 and 1.3.6.7 are vulnerable to password brute-force attacks during account lockout due to different retur
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2017-15135It was found that 389-ds-base since 1.3.6.1 up to and including 1.4.0.3 did not always handle internal hash comparison operations correctly
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2019-3883In 389-ds-base up to version 1.4.1.2, requests are handled by workers threads.
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2018-14648A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server.
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2018-14638A flaw was found in 389-ds-base before version 1.3.8.4-13.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2018-14624A vulnerability was discovered in 389-ds-base through versions 1.3.7.10, 1.3.8.8 and 1.4.0.16.
    31Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:389-ds-base1.3.2.9-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
red hat:389-ds-base0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:389-ds-base-debuginfo0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:389-ds-base-devel0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:389-ds-base-libs0:1.2.11.15-14.el6_4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
P · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack complexity
High
Confidentiality impact
P
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records