CVE-2012-4419: The compare_tor_addr_to_addr_policy function in or/policies.c in Tor before 0.2.2.39, and 0.2.3.x before 0.2.3.21-rc, allows remote…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 82.4% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: tor (Debian:12) 0.2.3.22-rc-1; tor (Debian:6.0) 0.2.2.39-1; tor (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.2.8.11-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to tor (Debian:12) 0.2.3.22-rc-1; tor (Debian:6.0) 0.2.2.39-1; tor (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.2.8.11-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The compare_tor_addr_to_addr_policy function in or/policies.c in Tor before 0.2.2.39, and 0.2.3.x before 0.2.3.21-rc, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a zero-valued port field that is not properly handled during policy comparison.
- Published
- Sep 14, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.1% · 82th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| torproject | tor | cpe:2.3:a:torproject:tor |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- torproject torup to 0.2.2.38 inclusive
- torproject tor0.0.2
- torproject tor0.0.3
- torproject tor0.0.4
- torproject tor0.0.5
- torproject tor0.0.6
- torproject tor0.0.6.1
- torproject tor0.0.6.2
+12 more rows
- torproject tor0.0.7
- torproject tor0.0.7.1
- torproject tor0.0.7.2
- torproject tor0.0.7.3
- torproject tor0.0.8.1
- torproject tor0.0.9.1
- torproject tor0.0.9.10
- torproject tor0.0.9.2
- torproject tor0.0.9.3
- torproject tor0.0.9.4
- torproject tor0.0.9.5
- torproject tor0.0.9.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | tor | before 0.2.3.22-rc-1 | 0.2.3.22-rc-1 |
| Debian:6.0 | tor | before 0.2.2.39-1 | 0.2.2.39-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | tor | before 0.2.8.11-1.1 | 0.2.8.11-1.1 |
Same product
torproject: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-77642tor before 0.4.9.9 was prone to an out-of-bounds write when parsing a consensus or detached signature with unexpected signature digest…37Monitor
- CVE-2026-77638Tor before 0.4.9.11 is prone to a race condition where in just the right circumstances a rendezvous point could man-in-the-middle…36Monitor
- CVE-2026-44603Tor before 0.4.9.7 has an out-of-bounds read by one byte via a malformed BEGIN cell, aka TROVE-2026-007.36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2012-4922Sep 14, 2012 · The tor_timegm function in common/util.c in Tor before 0.2.2.39, and 0.2.3.x before 0.2.3.22-rc, does not properly validate time values…21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2012-5573Jan 1, 2013 · The connection_edge_process_relay_cell function in or/relay.c in Tor before 0.2.3.25 maintains circuits even if an unexpected SENDME cell…21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2013-7295Jan 17, 2014 · Tor before 0.2.4.20, when OpenSSL 1.x is used in conjunction with a certain HardwareAccel setting on Intel Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge…17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:tor | 0.2.3.22-rc-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:tor | 0.2.8.11-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-10/msg00005.html
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/13/2
- secunia.com/advisories/50583
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-03.xml
- gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/release-0.2.2:/ReleaseNotes
- gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/commit/62d96284f7e0f81c40d5df7e53dd7b4dfe7e56a5
- lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-September/025434.html
- trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6690
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.