Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2012-2604· NVD / CVE Program· CNA certcc

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in GuestAccess.jsp in the Guest/Contractor access component in the administrative interf

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in GuestAccess.jsp in the Guest/Contractor access component in the administrative interface in Bradford Network Sentry before 5.3.3 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified fields.

LowCVSS 3.5 · v2.0—No exploit No fix recorded

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help
Published
Jun 13, 2012
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.1% · 64th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

14

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
14 / 40 · 3.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.1%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
bradfordnetworksnetwork sentry appliance software
bradfordnetworksnetwork sentry appliance

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • bradfordnetworks network sentry appliancens500rx
  • bradfordnetworks network sentry appliancens500x
  • bradfordnetworks network sentry appliance softwareup to 5.3 inclusive

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2012-2605Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the administrative interface in Bradford Network Sentry before 5.3.3 allow rem
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2012-2606The agent in Bradford Network Sentry before 5.3.3 does not require authentication for messages, which allows remote attackers to trigger the
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    none
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    none
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    None
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    None

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

    nvd-primary

    Root cause

    User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.

    A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

    Vulnerable

    ts
    commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;

    Fixed

    ts
    commentEl.textContent = comment.body;

    Change log

    No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

    References

    All records