Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2012-0875· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

SystemTap 1.7, 1.6.7, and probably other versions, when unprivileged mode is enabled, allows local users to obtain sensitive information fro

SystemTap 1.7, 1.6.7, and probably other versions, when unprivileged mode is enabled, allows local users to obtain sensitive information from kernel memory or cause a denial of service (kernel panic and crash) via vectors related to crafted DWARF data, which triggers a read of an invalid pointer.

MediumCVSS 5.4 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Feb 4, 2014
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 26th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
systemtapsystemtap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • systemtap systemtap1.6.7
  • systemtap systemtap1.7

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12systemtapbefore 1.7-11.7-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtapbefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-debuginfobefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-initscriptbefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-runtimebefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-sdt-develbefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-serverbefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-testsuitebefore 0:1.6-7.el5_80:1.6-7.el5_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtapbefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-debuginfobefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-grapherbefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-initscriptbefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-runtimebefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-sdt-develbefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-serverbefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientsystemtap-testsuitebefore 0:1.6-5.el6_20:1.6-5.el6_2

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2009-4273stap-server in SystemTap before 1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in stap command-line argu
    45Plan
  • CVE-2010-0412stap-server in SystemTap 1.1 does not properly restrict the value of the -B (aka BUILD) option, which allows attackers to have an unspecifie
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2010-4170The staprun runtime tool in SystemTap 1.3 does not properly clear the environment before executing modprobe, which allows local users to gai
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2009-0784Race condition in the SystemTap stap tool 0.0.20080705 and 0.0.20090314 allows local users in the stapusr group to insert arbitrary SystemTa
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2010-0411Multiple integer signedness errors in the (1) __get_argv and (2) __get_compat_argv functions in tapset/aux_syscalls.stp in SystemTap 1.1 all
    19Monitor
  • CVE-2011-2502runtime/staprun/staprun_funcs.c in the systemtap runtime tool (staprun) in SystemTap before 1.6 does not properly validate modules when a mo
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Debian:systemtap1.7-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-debuginfo0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-grapher0:1.6-5.el6_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-initscript0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-runtime0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-sdt-devel0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-server0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
Red Hat:systemtap-testsuite0:1.6-7.el5_8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    P · data can be read
    Integrity
    none
    Availability
    C · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    P
    Integrity impact
    None
    Availability impact
    C

    CVSS vector

    AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:C

    nvd-primary

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records