CVE-2011-4862: Buffer overflow in libtelnet/encrypt.c in telnetd in FreeBSD 7.3 through 9.0, MIT Kerberos Version 5 Applications (aka krb5-appl) 1.0.2 and…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: This week (action score 69/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB, GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 95% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.8% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: heimdal (Debian:12) 1.5.dfsg.1-1; inetutils (Debian:12) 2:1.8-6; krb5 (Debian:12) 1.8+dfsg~aa+r23527-1.
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window. Upgrade to heimdal (Debian:12) 1.5.dfsg.1-1; inetutils (Debian:12) 2:1.8-6; krb5 (Debian:12) 1.8+dfsg~aa+r23527-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Buffer overflow in libtelnet/encrypt.c in telnetd in FreeBSD 7.3 through 9.0, MIT Kerberos Version 5 Applications (aka krb5-appl) 1.0.2 and earlier, Heimdal 1.5.1 and earlier, GNU inetutils, and possibly other products allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long encryption key, as exploited in the wild in December 2011.
- Published
- Dec 24, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 95.0% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
69
Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.
- CVSS
- 40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 29 / 30 · 95.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Weaponized exploit exists
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| mit | krb5-appl | cpe:2.3:a:mit:krb5-appl |
| gnu | inetutils | cpe:2.3:a:gnu:inetutils |
| heimdal project | heimdal | cpe:2.3:a:heimdal_project:heimdal |
| freebsd | freebsd | cpe:2.3:o:freebsd:freebsd |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
| suse | linux enterprise desktop | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_desktop |
| suse | linux enterprise server | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_server |
| suse | linux enterprise software development kit | cpe:2.3:o:suse:linux_enterprise_software_development_kit |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- debian debian linux5.0
- debian debian linux6.0
- debian debian linux7.0
- fedoraproject fedora15
- fedoraproject fedora16
- freebsd freebsd7.3 and later · up to 9.0 inclusive
- gnu inetutilsbefore 1.9
- heimdal project heimdalup to 1.5.1 inclusive
+10 more rows
- mit krb5-applup to 1.0.2 inclusive
- opensuse opensuse11.3
- opensuse opensuse11.4
- suse linux enterprise desktop10
- suse linux enterprise desktop11
- suse linux enterprise server10
- suse linux enterprise server11
- suse linux enterprise server9
- suse linux enterprise software development kit10
- suse linux enterprise software development kit11
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | heimdal | before 1.5.dfsg.1-1 | 1.5.dfsg.1-1 |
| Debian:12 | inetutils | before 2:1.8-6 | 2:1.8-6 |
| Debian:12 | krb5 | before 1.8+dfsg~aa+r23527-1 | 1.8+dfsg~aa+r23527-1 |
| Debian:5.0 | heimdal | before 1.2.dfsg.1-2.1+lenny1 | 1.2.dfsg.1-2.1+lenny1 |
| Debian:5.0 | inetutils | before 2:1.5.dfsg.1-9+lenny1 | 2:1.5.dfsg.1-9+lenny1 |
| Debian:5.0 | krb5 | before 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5lenny7 | 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5lenny7 |
| Debian:6.0 | heimdal | before 1.4.0~git20100726.dfsg.1-2+squeeze1 | 1.4.0~git20100726.dfsg.1-2+squeeze1 |
| Debian:6.0 | inetutils | before 2:1.6-3.1+squeeze1 | 2:1.6-3.1+squeeze1 |
| Debian:6.0 | krb5-appl | before 1:1.0.1-1.2 | 1:1.0.1-1.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5 | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5-debuginfo | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5-devel | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5-libs | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5-server | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | krb5-workstation | before 0:1.3.4-65.el4 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | krb5 | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | krb5-debuginfo | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | krb5-libs | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | krb5-workstation | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | krb5-devel | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | krb5-server | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | krb5-server-ldap | before 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-appl | before 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-appl-clients | before 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 |
+29
Same product
mit: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-25018In the rcp client in MIT krb5-appl through 1.0.3, malicious servers could bypass intended access restrictions via the filename of .30Monitor
- CVE-2011-1526ftpd.c in the GSS-API FTP daemon in MIT Kerberos Version 5 Applications (aka krb5-appl) 1.0.1 and earlier does not check the krb5_setegid…27Monitor
- CVE-2019-25017An issue was discovered in rcp in MIT krb5-appl through 1.0.3.23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:heimdal | 1.5.dfsg.1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:inetutils | 2:1.8-6 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:krb5 | 1.8+dfsg~aa+r23527-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:krb5-appl | 1:1.0.1-1.2 · Debian:6.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5 | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-appl | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-appl-clients | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-appl-debuginfo | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-appl-servers | 0:1.0.1-7.el6_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-debuginfo | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-devel | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-libs | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-server | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-server-ldap | 0:1.6.1-63.el5_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-workstation | 0:1.3.4-65.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×3
- Exploit-DB entry ×3
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×3
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | 3 repositories | 2017-02-02 → 2020-02-06 |
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2012-01-14 |
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2012-01-14 |
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2011-12-26 |
| Metasploit module | auxiliary/scanner/telnet/telnet_encrypt_overflowTelnet Service Encryption Key ID Overflow Detectionauxiliary | — |
| Metasploit module | exploit/freebsd/telnet/telnet_encrypt_keyidFreeBSD Telnet Service Encryption Key ID Buffer Overflowexploit | 2011-12-23 |
| Metasploit module | exploit/linux/telnet/telnet_encrypt_keyidLinux BSD-derived Telnet Service Encryption Key ID Buffer Overflowexploit | 2011-12-23 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploit-2 d
- Published
- First PoC+1 d
- TodayNov 13, 2026+5438 d
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- C · data can be read
- Integrity
- C · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- C
- Integrity impact
- C
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd-primary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/commit/?id=665f1e73cdd9b38e2d2e11b8db9958a315935592
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-January/071627.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-January/071640.html
- lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2011-December/006117.html
- lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2011-December/006118.html
- lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2011-December/006119.html
- lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2011-December/006120.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00002.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00004.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00005.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00007.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00010.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00014.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-01/msg00015.html
- osvdb.org/78020
- secunia.com/advisories/46239
- secunia.com/advisories/47341
- secunia.com/advisories/47348
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.