CVE-2011-4608: mod_cluster in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2 for Red Hat Linux allows worker nodes to register with arbitrary virtual hosts…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.1% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: mod_cluster (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4; mod_cluster-demo (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4; mod_cluster-jbossas (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to mod_cluster (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4; mod_cluster-demo (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4; mod_cluster-jbossas (Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4) 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
mod_cluster in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2 for Red Hat Linux allows worker nodes to register with arbitrary virtual hosts, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and provide malicious content, hijack sessions, and steal credentials by registering from an external vhost that does not enforce security constraints.
- Published
- Jan 27, 2012
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.1% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-264
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | jboss enterprise application platform | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat jboss enterprise application platform5.1.2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster | before 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-demo | before 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-jbossas | before 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-jbossweb2 | before 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-native | before 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-native-debuginfo | before 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | mod_cluster-tomcat6 | before 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster | before 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster-demo | before 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster-jbossas | before 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster-jbossweb2 | before 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster-native | before 0:1.0.10-4.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-4.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el5 | mod_cluster-tomcat6 | before 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 | 0:1.0.10-3.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el5 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster | before 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster-demo | before 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster-jbossas | before 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster-jbossweb2 | before 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster-native | before 0:1.0.10-4.1.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-4.1.1.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
| Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el6 | mod_cluster-tomcat6 | before 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 | 0:1.0.10-3.2.GA_CP02.ep5.el6 |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-12149In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the…KEV96Now
- CVE-2010-1871JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for…KEV90Now
- CVE-2010-1428The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before…KEV76This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-1484Jul 26, 2011 · jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP04 and…28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-2196Jul 26, 2011 · jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP05 and…28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2012-1154Oct 22, 2012 · mod_cluster 1.0.10 before 1.0.10 CP03 and 1.1.x before 1.1.4, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2, when "ROOT" is set to…18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:mod_cluster | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-demo | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-jbossas | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-jbossweb2 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-native | 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-native-debuginfo | 0:1.0.10-4.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:mod_cluster-tomcat6 | 0:1.0.10-3.GA_CP02.ep5.el4 · Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:1::el4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-264 · Permissions, Privileges, and Access ControlsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2012-0036.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2012-0037.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2012-0038.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2012-0039.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2012-0040.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/51554
- www.securitytracker.com/id?1026545
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767020
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/72460
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.