Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2011-1926· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

The STARTTLS implementation in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.4.7 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attac

The STARTTLS implementation in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.4.7 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted sessions by sending a cleartext command that is processed after TLS is in place, related to a "plaintext command injection" attack, a similar issue to CVE-2011-0411.

MediumCVSS 5.1 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
May 23, 2011
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.0% · 90th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.0%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
cmucyrus imap server

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • cmu cyrus imap serverup to 2.4.6 inclusive
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.0.17
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.1.16
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.1.17
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.1.18
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.10
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.11
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.12
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.13
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.13p1
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.8
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.2.9
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.0
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.1
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.10
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.11
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.12
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.13
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.14
  • cmu cyrus imap server2.3.15

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:5.0cyrus-imapd-2.2before 2.2.13-14+lenny42.2.13-14+lenny4
Debian:5.0kolab-cyrus-imapdbefore 2.2.13-5+lenny32.2.13-5+lenny3
Debian:6.0cyrus-imapd-2.2before 2.2.13-19+squeeze12.2.13-19+squeeze1
Debian:6.0kolab-cyrus-imapdbefore 2.2.13-9.12.2.13-9.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapdbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapd-debuginfobefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapd-develbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapd-murderbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapd-nntpbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascyrus-imapd-utilsbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asperl-Cyrusbefore 0:2.2.12-15.el40:2.2.12-15.el4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::servercyrus-imapdbefore 0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.40:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::servercyrus-imapd-debuginfobefore 0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.40:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::servercyrus-imapd-develbefore 0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.40:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::servercyrus-imapd-perlbefore 0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.40:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::servercyrus-imapd-utilsbefore 0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.40:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::servercyrus-imapdbefore 0:2.3.16-6.el6_1.20:2.3.16-6.el6_1.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::servercyrus-imapd-debuginfobefore 0:2.3.16-6.el6_1.20:2.3.16-6.el6_1.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::servercyrus-imapd-develbefore 0:2.3.16-6.el6_1.20:2.3.16-6.el6_1.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::servercyrus-imapd-utilsbefore 0:2.3.16-6.el6_1.20:2.3.16-6.el6_1.2

Same product

cmu: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2011-3208Stack-based buffer overflow in the split_wildmats function in nntpd.c in nntpd in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.3.17 and 2.4.x before 2.4.11 al
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2011-3481The index_get_ids function in index.c in imapd in Cyrus IMAP Server before 2.4.11, when server-side threading is enabled, allows remote atta
    18Monitor
  • CVE-2009-2632Buffer overflow in the SIEVE script component (sieve/script.c), as used in cyrus-imapd in Cyrus IMAP Server 2.2.13 and 2.3.14, and Dovecot 1
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:cyrus-imapd-2.22.2.13-14+lenny4 · Debian:5.0Package registry (OSV)
debian:kolab-cyrus-imapd2.2.13-9.1 · Debian:6.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-debuginfo0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-devel0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-murder0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-nntp0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-perl0:2.3.7-7.el5_6.4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::serverPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:cyrus-imapd-utils0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:perl-Cyrus0:2.2.12-15.el4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
P · data can be read
Integrity
P · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
P · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
High
Confidentiality impact
P
Integrity impact
P
Availability impact
P

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records