CVE-2011-0720: Unspecified vulnerability in Plone 2.5 through 4.0, as used in Conga, luci, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to obtain…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.3% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: plone (PyPI) 4.0.4, 4.0.1; conga (Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4) 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2; conga-debuginfo (Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4) 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to plone (PyPI) 4.0.4, 4.0.1; conga (Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4) 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2; conga-debuginfo (Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4) 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Unspecified vulnerability in Plone 2.5 through 4.0, as used in Conga, luci, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access, read or create arbitrary content, and change the site skin via unknown vectors.
- Published
- Feb 3, 2011
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.1% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| plone | plone | cpe:2.3:a:plone:plone |
| redhat | conga | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:conga |
| redhat | luci | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:luci |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- plone plone2.5
- plone plone2.5.1
- plone plone2.5.2
- plone plone2.5.3
- plone plone2.5.4
- plone plone2.5.5
- plone plone3.0
- plone plone3.0.1
+12 more rows
- plone plone3.0.2
- plone plone3.0.3
- plone plone3.0.4
- plone plone3.0.5
- plone plone3.0.6
- plone plone3.1
- plone plone3.1.1
- plone plone3.1.2
- plone plone3.1.3
- plone plone3.1.4
- plone plone3.1.5.1
- plone plone3.1.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | plone | from 2.5 · before 4.0.4 | 4.0.4 |
| PyPI | plone | before 4.0.1 | 4.0.1 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | conga | before 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | conga-debuginfo | before 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | luci | before 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | ricci | before 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:5 | conga | before 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 | 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:5 | conga-debuginfo | before 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 | 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:5 | luci | before 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 | 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 |
| Red Hat:rhel_cluster:5 | ricci | before 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 | 0:0.12.2-24.el5_6.1 |
Same product
plone: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2011-3587Unspecified vulnerability in Zope 2.12.x and 2.13.x, as used in Plone 4.0.x through 4.0.9, 4.1, and 4.2 through 4.2a2, allows remote…60This week
- CVE-2021-33509Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to perform disk I/O via crafted keyword arguments to the ReStructuredText…40Plan
- CVE-2020-35190The official plone Docker images before version of 4.3.18-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2008-4571Oct 15, 2008 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the LiveSearch module in Plone before 3.0.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web…17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2010-2422Jun 24, 2010 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PortalTransforms in Plone 2.1 through 3.3.4 before hotfix 20100612 allows remote attackers to…18Monitor
- Later →CVE-2011-1948Jun 6, 2011 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Plone 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a…18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PyPI:plone | 4.0.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| PyPI:plone | 4.0.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:conga | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 · Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:conga-debuginfo | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 · Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:luci | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 · Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ricci | 0:0.11.2-4.el4.2 · Red Hat:rhel_cluster:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/cve-2011-0720
- secunia.com/advisories/43146
- secunia.com/advisories/43914
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0393.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0394.html
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/46102
- www.securitytracker.com/id?1025258
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0796
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65099
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.