The TIFFExtractData macro in LibTIFF before 3.9.4 does not properly handle unknown tag types in TIFF directory entries, which allows remote
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.8% of all records.
- Fixed version: tiff (Debian:12) 3.9.4-1; libtiff (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5; libtiff-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to tiff (Debian:12) 3.9.4-1; libtiff (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5; libtiff-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
The TIFFExtractData macro in LibTIFF before 3.9.4 does not properly handle unknown tag types in TIFF directory entries, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted TIFF file.
- Published
- Jul 6, 2010
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.0% · 87th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| libtiff | libtiff | cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- libtiff libtiffup to 3.9.3 inclusive
- libtiff libtiff3.4
- libtiff libtiff3.5.1
- libtiff libtiff3.5.2
- libtiff libtiff3.5.3
- libtiff libtiff3.5.4
- libtiff libtiff3.5.5
- libtiff libtiff3.5.6
- libtiff libtiff3.5.7
- libtiff libtiff3.6.0
- libtiff libtiff3.6.1
- libtiff libtiff3.7.0
- libtiff libtiff3.7.1
- libtiff libtiff3.7.2
- libtiff libtiff3.7.3
- libtiff libtiff3.7.4
- libtiff libtiff3.8.0
- libtiff libtiff3.8.1
- libtiff libtiff3.8.2
- libtiff libtiff3.9
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | tiff | before 3.9.4-1 | 3.9.4-1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | libtiff | before 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | libtiff-devel | before 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | libtiff | before 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 | 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | libtiff-debuginfo | before 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 | 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | libtiff-devel | before 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 | 0:3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 |
Same product
libtiff: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2006-3459Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TIFF library (libtiff) before 3.8.2, as used in Adobe Reader 9.3.0 and other products, allow co46Plan
- CVE-2004-1308Integer overflow in (1) tif_dirread.c and (2) tif_fax3.c for libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a44Plan
- CVE-2018-12900Heap-based buffer overflow in the cpSeparateBufToContigBuf function in tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0beta7, 4.43Plan
- CVE-2015-8668Heap-based buffer overflow in the PackBitsPreEncode function in tif_packbits.c in bmp2tiff in libtiff 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attack43Plan
- CVE-2004-0929Heap-based buffer overflow in the OJPEGVSetField function in tif_ojpeg.c for libtiff 3.6.1 and earlier, when compiled with the OJPEG_SUPPORT42Plan
- CVE-2016-9540tools/tiffcp.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an out-of-bounds write on tiled images with odd tile width versus image width.40Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:tiff | 3.9.4-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-debuginfo | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libtiff-devel | 0:3.6.1-12.el4_8.5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (10 more)Show less
- marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127736307002102&w=2
- marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127738540902757&w=2
- marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127781315415896&w=2
- marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=127797353202873&w=2
- secunia.com/advisories/40527
- secunia.com/advisories/50726
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-02.xml
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/06/30/22
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0519.html
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1761
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.