Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

CVE-2010-0921: Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allow

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
  • According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to lack of "XSS/CSRF Get Filter and Referer Check fixes."

MediumCVSS 6.8 · v2.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Mar 3, 2010
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 47th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

27

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2010-0921

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for ibm records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
ibmlotus inotes
ibmlotus domino

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • ibm lotus inotesup to 229.271 inclusive
  • ibm lotus inotes229.011
  • ibm lotus inotes229.021
  • ibm lotus inotes229.031
  • ibm lotus inotes229.041
  • ibm lotus inotes229.051
  • ibm lotus inotes229.061
  • ibm lotus inotes229.101
  • ibm lotus inotes229.111
  • ibm lotus inotes229.131
  • ibm lotus inotes229.141
  • ibm lotus inotes229.151
  • ibm lotus inotes229.161
  • ibm lotus inotes229.171
  • ibm lotus inotes229.181
  • ibm lotus inotes229.191
  • ibm lotus inotes229.201
  • ibm lotus inotes229.211
  • ibm lotus inotes229.221
  • ibm lotus inotes229.231

Same product

ibm: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2012-2175Buffer overflow in the Attachment_Times method in a certain ActiveX control in dwa85W.dll in IBM Lotus iNotes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP2 allows
    46Plan
  • CVE-2010-0918Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the UltraLite functionality in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Do
    41Plan
  • CVE-2010-0275Ultra-light Mode in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.241 for Domino 8.0.2 FP3 does not properly handle script comm
    40Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2010-0274Jan 9, 2010 · Unspecified vulnerability in the Edit Contact scene in Ultra-light Mode in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.241 fo
    40Plan
  • ← EarlierCVE-2010-0920Mar 3, 2010 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Lotus iNotes (aka Domino Web Access or DWA) before 229.281 for Domino 8.0.2 FP4 allows remot
    17Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2012-5943Mar 26, 2013 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM iNotes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP4 allows user-assisted remote attackers to inject arbitrary web
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    P · data can be read
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    P · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    P
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    P

    Weakness class (CWE)

    CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

    nvd-primary

    Root cause

    State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.

    The bug in code

    The whole CWE-352 class

    A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

    Vulnerable

    ts
    app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);

    Fixed

    ts
    app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    ATT&CK techniques

    —

    Change log

    No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

    References

    Show all references (3 more)

    Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

    All records