Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

CVE-2010-0411: Multiple integer signedness errors in the (1) __get_argv and (2) __get_compat_argv functions in tapset/aux_syscalls.stp in SystemTap 1.1 all

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 19/100)

  • Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.94% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 60.8% of all records.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: systemtap (Debian:12) 1.2-1; systemtap (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.0-1.6; systemtap (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to systemtap (Debian:12) 1.2-1; systemtap (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 3.0-1.6; systemtap (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Multiple integer signedness errors in the (1) __get_argv and (2) __get_compat_argv functions in tapset/aux_syscalls.stp in SystemTap 1.1 allow local users to cause a denial of service (script crash, or system crash or hang) via a process with a large number of arguments, leading to a buffer overflow.

MediumCVSS 4.9 · v2.0—Proof of concept Fix available
Published
Feb 8, 2010
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.9% · 60th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

19

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
19 / 40 · 4.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.9%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2010-0411

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for systemtap records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
systemtapsystemtap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • systemtap systemtap1.1

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12systemtapbefore 1.2-11.2-1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedsystemtapbefore 3.0-1.63.0-1.6
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::assystemtapbefore 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.10:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::assystemtap-debuginfobefore 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.10:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::assystemtap-runtimebefore 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.10:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::assystemtap-testsuitebefore 0:0.6.2-2.el4_8.10:0.6.2-2.el4_8.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtapbefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-clientbefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-debuginfobefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-initscriptbefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-runtimebefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-sdt-develbefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-serverbefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientsystemtap-testsuitebefore 0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.30:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3

Same product

systemtap: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2009-4273stap-server in SystemTap before 1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in stap command-line argu
    45Plan
  • CVE-2010-4170The staprun runtime tool in SystemTap 1.3 does not properly clear the environment before executing modprobe, which allows local users to gai
    40Plan
  • CVE-2010-0412stap-server in SystemTap 1.1 does not properly restrict the value of the -B (aka BUILD) option, which allows attackers to have an unspecifie
    31Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2009-0784Mar 25, 2009 · Race condition in the SystemTap stap tool 0.0.20080705 and 0.0.20090314 allows local users in the stapusr group to insert arbitrary SystemTa
    25Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2009-2911Oct 22, 2009 · SystemTap 1.0, when the --unprivileged option is used, does not properly restrict certain data sizes, which allows local users to (1) cause
    7Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2010-4171Dec 7, 2010 · The staprun runtime tool in SystemTap 1.3 does not verify that a module to unload was previously loaded by SystemTap, which allows local use
    8Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:systemtap1.2-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:systemtap3.0-1.6 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-client0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-debuginfo0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-initscript0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-runtime0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-sdt-devel0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-server0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:systemtap-testsuite0:0.9.7-5.el5_4.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Exploit-DB entry ×1

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Exploit-DB entrylocal2010-02-05

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. First PoC-4 d
  2. Published
  3. TodayOct 26, 2026+6104 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
C · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
C

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-189 · Numeric Errors

CVSS vector

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (16 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records