Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2009-2474· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

neon before 0.28.6, when OpenSSL or GnuTLS is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name

neon before 0.28.6, when OpenSSL or GnuTLS is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.

MediumCVSS 5.8 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Aug 21, 2009
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.5% · 73th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

23

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
23 / 40 · 5.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.5%

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
webdavneon
applemac os x
canonicalubuntu linux
fedoraprojectfedora

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • apple mac os xbefore 10.6.5
  • canonical ubuntu linux6.06
  • canonical ubuntu linux8.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux8.10
  • canonical ubuntu linux9.04
  • fedoraproject fedora10
  • fedoraproject fedora11
  • webdav neonbefore 0.28.6

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12litmusbefore 0.13-10.13-1
Debian:12neon27before 0.28.6-10.28.6-1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asneonbefore 0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.20:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asneon-debuginfobefore 0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.20:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asneon-develbefore 0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.20:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationneonbefore 0:0.25.5-10.el5_4.10:0.25.5-10.el5_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationneon-debuginfobefore 0:0.25.5-10.el5_4.10:0.25.5-10.el5_4.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationneon-develbefore 0:0.25.5-10.el5_4.10:0.25.5-10.el5_4.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2004-0179Multiple format string vulnerabilities in (1) neon 0.24.4 and earlier, and other products that use neon including (2) Cadaver, (3) Subversio
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2009-2473neon before 0.28.6, when expat is used, does not properly detect recursion during entity expansion, which allows context-dependent attackers
    20Monitor
  • CVE-2008-3746neon 0.28.0 through 0.28.2 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and crash) via vectors related to Di
    18Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:litmus0.13-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:neon270.28.6-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
red hat:neon0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:neon-debuginfo0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:neon-devel0:0.24.7-4.el4_8.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    P · data can be read
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    none
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    P
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    None

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

    nvd-primary

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records