Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2009-0733· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the ReadSetOfCurves function in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefo

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the ReadSetOfCurves function in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted image file associated with a large integer value for the (1) input or (2) output channel, related to the ReadLUT_A2B and ReadLUT_B2A functions.

CriticalCVSS 9.3 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 23, 2009
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
5.5% · 93th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

39

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
2 / 30 · 5.5%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
littlecmslittle cms
gimpgimp
mozillafirefox
sunopenjdk

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • gimp gimpbefore 2.9.2
  • littlecms little cmsup to 1.17 inclusive
  • mozilla firefox3.1
  • sun openjdkup to 7 inclusive

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:4.0lcmsbefore 1.15-1.1+etch21.15-1.1+etch2
Debian:5.0lcmsbefore 1.17.dfsg-1+lenny11.17.dfsg-1+lenny1
Debian:5.0openjdk-6before 6b11-9.1+lenny26b11-9.1+lenny2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdkbefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfobefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdk-demobefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdk-develbefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdk-javadocbefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientjava-1.6.0-openjdk-srcbefore 1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el51:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientpython-lcmsbefore 0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.20:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationlcmsbefore 0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.20:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationlcms-debuginfobefore 0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.20:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationlcms-develbefore 0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.20:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-11556tificc in Little CMS 2.9 has an out-of-bounds write in the cmsPipelineCheckAndRetreiveStages function in cmslut.c in liblcms2.a via a crafte
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2018-11555tificc in Little CMS 2.9 has an out-of-bounds write in the PrecalculatedXFORM function in cmsxform.c in liblcms2.a via a crafted TIFF file.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2026-41254Little CMS (lcms2) through 2.18 has an integer overflow in CubeSize in cmslut.c because the overflow check is performed after the multiplica
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2009-0581Memory leak in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allows context-dependent att
    18Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:lcms1.15-1.1+etch2 · Debian:4.0Package registry (OSV)
debian:openjdk-66b11-9.1+lenny2 · Debian:5.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:java-1.6.0-openjdk-src1:1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lcms0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lcms-debuginfo0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lcms-devel0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:python-lcms0:1.18-0.1.beta1.el5_3.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    C · data can be read
    Integrity
    C · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    C · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    C
    Integrity impact
    C
    Availability impact
    C

    Weakness class (CWE)

    CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

    nvd-primary

    Attack context

    MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

    MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records