CVE-2008-6886: RSA EnVision 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.5.2, and 3.7.0 does not properly restrict access to unspecified user profile functionality, which allows remote
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 74% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
RSA EnVision 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.5.2, and 3.7.0 does not properly restrict access to unspecified user profile functionality, which allows remote attackers to obtain the administrator password hash and conduct brute force guessing attacks.
- Published
- Aug 3, 2009
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 74th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-264
Report tools
Action score
20
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rsa | envision | cpe:2.3:a:rsa:envision |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rsa envision3.5.0
- rsa envision3.5.1
- rsa envision3.5.2
- rsa envision3.7.0
Same product
rsa: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2012-0402EMC RSA enVision 4.x before 4.1 Patch 4 uses unspecified hardcoded credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access 38Monitor
- CVE-2012-0400EMC RSA enVision 4.x before 4.1 Patch 4 does not properly restrict the number of failed authentication attempts, which makes it easier for r31Monitor
- CVE-2012-0401Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in EMC RSA enVision 4.x before 4.1 Patch 4 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL 26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2007-4900Sep 14, 2007 · Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the logon page in RSA EnVision 3.3.6 Build 0115 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web 17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2010-2634Aug 10, 2010 · RSA enVision before 3.7 SP1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.16Monitor
- Later →CVE-2011-2736Aug 25, 2011 · RSA enVision 4.x before 4 SP4 P3 places cleartext administrative credentials in Task Escalation e-mail messages, which allows remote attacke20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-264 · Permissions, Privileges, and Access ControlsCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.