Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2008-2383· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

CRLF injection vulnerability in xterm allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary commands via LF (aka \n) characters surrounding a

CRLF injection vulnerability in xterm allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary commands via LF (aka \n) characters surrounding a command name within a Device Control Request Status String (DECRQSS) escape sequence in a text file, a related issue to CVE-2003-0063 and CVE-2003-0071.

CriticalCVSS 9.3 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jan 2, 2009
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.9% · 92th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

38

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.9%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
invisible-islandxterm

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • invisible-island xterm_nil_

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12xtermbefore 238-2238-2
Debian:4.0xtermbefore 222-1etch3222-1etch3
Debian:5.0xtermbefore 235-2235-2
openSUSE:Tumbleweedxtermbefore 368-2.2368-2.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::ashanterm-xfbefore 1:2.0.5-5.AS21.21:2.0.5-5.AS21.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asxtermbefore 0:179-11.EL30:179-11.EL3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asxterm-debuginfobefore 0:179-11.EL30:179-11.EL3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asxtermbefore 0:192-8.el4_7.20:192-8.el4_7.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asxterm-debuginfobefore 0:192-8.el4_7.20:192-8.el4_7.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientxtermbefore 0:215-5.el5_2.20:215-5.el5_2.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientxterm-debuginfobefore 0:215-5.el5_2.20:215-5.el5_2.2

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2022-45063xterm before 375 allows code execution via font ops, e.g., because an OSC 50 response may have Ctrl-g and therefore lead to command executio
    41Plan
  • CVE-2021-27135xterm before Patch #366 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a crafted UT
    41Plan
  • CVE-2023-40359xterm before 380 supports ReGIS reporting for character-set names even if they have unexpected characters (i.e., neither alphanumeric nor un
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2022-24130xterm through Patch 370, when Sixel support is enabled, allows attackers to trigger a buffer overflow in set_sixel in graphics_sixel.c via c
    23Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:xterm238-2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:xterm368-2.2 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:hanterm-xf1:2.0.5-5.AS21.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:xterm0:179-11.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:xterm-debuginfo0:179-11.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    C · data can be read
    Integrity
    C · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    C · the service can be disrupted
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    C
    Integrity impact
    C
    Availability impact
    C

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

    nvd-primary

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records