Untrusted search path vulnerability in a certain Red Hat build script for OpenOffice.org (OOo) 1.1.x on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 3 an
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.32% (FIRST EPSS).
- Fixed version: openoffice.org (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3; openoffice.org-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3; openoffice.org-i18n (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openoffice.org (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3; openoffice.org-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3; openoffice.org-i18n (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as) 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Untrusted search path vulnerability in a certain Red Hat build script for OpenOffice.org (OOo) 1.1.x on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 3 and 4 allows local users to gain privileges via a malicious library in the current working directory, related to incorrect quoting of the ORIGIN symbol for use in the RPATH library path.
- Published
- Jun 16, 2008
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 23th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-16
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openoffice | openoffice | cpe:2.3:a:openoffice:openoffice |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openoffice openoffice1.1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | openoffice.org | before 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | openoffice.org-debuginfo | before 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | openoffice.org-i18n | before 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | openoffice.org-libs | before 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | openoffice.org | before 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | openoffice.org-debuginfo | before 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | openoffice.org-i18n | before 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | openoffice.org-kde | before 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | openoffice.org-libs | before 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 |
Same product
openoffice: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2007-4575HSQLDB before 1.8.0.9, as used in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2 before 2.3.1, allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code 41Plan
- CVE-2006-5870Multiple integer overflows in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.4 and earlier, and possibly other versions before 2.1.0; and StarOffice 6 through 8; 40Plan
- CVE-2007-0245Heap-based buffer overflow in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a RTF file with a39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2007-0239Mar 21, 2007 · OpenOffice.org (OOo) Office Suite allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a prepared38Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2007-4251Aug 8, 2007 · OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.2 does not properly handle files with multiple extensions, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a den17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2007-5745Apr 17, 2008 · Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in OpenOffice.org before 2.4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly e28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:openoffice.org | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openoffice.org-debuginfo | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openoffice.org-i18n | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openoffice.org-kde | 0:1.1.5-10.6.0.5.EL4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:openoffice.org-libs | 0:1.1.2-42.2.0.EL3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-16 · ConfigurationCVSS vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.