Stack-based buffer overflow in the zseticcspace function in zicc.c in Ghostscript 8.61 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitr
Stack-based buffer overflow in the zseticcspace function in zicc.c in Ghostscript 8.61 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a postscript (.ps) file containing a long Range array in a .seticcspace operator.
- Published
- Feb 28, 2008
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 14.5% · 97th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 4 / 30 · 14.5%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ghostscript | ghostscript | cpe:2.3:a:ghostscript:ghostscript |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| mandrakesoft | mandrake linux | cpe:2.3:o:mandrakesoft:mandrake_linux |
| mandrakesoft | mandrake linux corporate server | cpe:2.3:o:mandrakesoft:mandrake_linux_corporate_server |
| mandrakesoft | mandrakesoft corporate server | cpe:2.3:o:mandrakesoft:mandrakesoft_corporate_server |
| redhat | desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop_workstation |
| rpath | rpath linux | cpe:2.3:o:rpath:rpath_linux |
| suse | novell linux pos | cpe:2.3:o:suse:novell_linux_pos |
| suse | open suse | cpe:2.3:o:suse:open_suse |
and 2 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ghostscript ghostscriptup to 8.61 inclusive
- ghostscript ghostscript0
- ghostscript ghostscript8.0.1
- ghostscript ghostscript8.15
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ghostscript | before 8.61.dfsg.1-1.1 | 8.61.dfsg.1-1.1 |
| Debian:3.1 | gs-esp | before 7.07.1-9sarge1 | 7.07.1-9sarge1 |
| Debian:3.1 | gs-gpl | before 8.01-6 | 8.01-6 |
| Debian:4.0 | gs-esp | before 8.15.3.dfsg.1-1etch1 | 8.15.3.dfsg.1-1etch1 |
| Debian:4.0 | gs-gpl | before 8.54.dfsg.1-5etch1 | 8.54.dfsg.1-5etch1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | ghostscript | before 0:7.05-32.1.13 | 0:7.05-32.1.13 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | ghostscript-debuginfo | before 0:7.05-32.1.13 | 0:7.05-32.1.13 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | ghostscript-devel | before 0:7.05-32.1.13 | 0:7.05-32.1.13 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | hpijs | before 0:1.3-32.1.13 | 0:1.3-32.1.13 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | ghostscript | before 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 | 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | ghostscript-debuginfo | before 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 | 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | ghostscript-devel | before 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 | 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | ghostscript-gtk | before 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 | 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | ghostscript-gtk | before 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 | 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | ghostscript | before 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 | 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | ghostscript-debuginfo | before 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 | 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstation | ghostscript-devel | before 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 | 0:8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 |
Same product
ghostscript: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2009-4270Stack-based buffer overflow in the errprintf function in base/gsmisc.c in ghostscript 8.64 through 8.70 allows remote attackers to cause a d39Monitor
- CVE-2009-0196Heap-based buffer overflow in the big2_decode_symbol_dict function (jbig2_symbol_dict.c) in the JBIG2 decoding library (jbig2dec) in Ghostsc39Monitor
- CVE-2009-0792Multiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and38Monitor
- CVE-2009-0584icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll Color Mana38Monitor
- CVE-2009-0583Multiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and38Monitor
- CVE-2007-6725The CCITTFax decoding filter in Ghostscript 8.60, 8.61, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (c31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ghostscript | 8.61.dfsg.1-1.1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:gs-esp | 7.07.1-9sarge1 · Debian:3.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:gs-gpl | 8.01-6 · Debian:3.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript | 0:7.05-32.1.13 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-debuginfo | 0:7.05-32.1.13 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-devel | 0:7.05-32.1.13 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ghostscript-gtk | 0:7.07-33.2.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:hpijs | 0:1.3-32.1.13 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2008-02-27 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-2 d
- Published
- TodaySep 30, 2026+6789 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-02/msg00009.html
- secunia.com/advisories/29101
- secunia.com/advisories/29103
- secunia.com/advisories/29112
- secunia.com/advisories/29135
- secunia.com/advisories/29147
- secunia.com/advisories/29154
- secunia.com/advisories/29169
- secunia.com/advisories/29196
- secunia.com/advisories/29314
- secunia.com/advisories/29768
- slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2008&m=slackware-security.370633
- wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0082
- www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1510
- www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200803-14.xml
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:055
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0155.html
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/488932/100/0/threaded
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/488946/100/0/threaded
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/28017
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.