Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2007-4743· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

The original patch for CVE-2007-3999 in svc_auth_gss.c in the RPCSEC_GSS RPC library in MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.4 through 1.6.2, as used by

The original patch for CVE-2007-3999 in svc_auth_gss.c in the RPCSEC_GSS RPC library in MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.4 through 1.6.2, as used by the Kerberos administration daemon (kadmind) and other applications that use krb5, does not correctly check the buffer length in some environments and architectures, which might allow remote attackers to conduct a buffer overflow attack.

CriticalCVSS 10.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 6, 2007
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.6% · 91th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

41

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.6%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
mitkerberos 5

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • mit kerberos 51.4
  • mit kerberos 51.4.1
  • mit kerberos 51.4.2
  • mit kerberos 51.4.3
  • mit kerberos 51.4.4
  • mit kerberos 51.5
  • mit kerberos 51.5.1
  • mit kerberos 51.5.2
  • mit kerberos 51.5.3
  • mit kerberos 51.6
  • mit kerberos 51.6.1
  • mit kerberos 51.6.2

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12krb5before 1.6.dfsg.1-71.6.dfsg.1-7
Debian:4.0krb5before 1.4.4-7etch41.4.4-7etch4
Debian:4.0librpcsecgssbefore 0.14-2etch30.14-2etch3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientkrb5-libsbefore 0:1.5-290:1.5-29
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientkrb5-workstationbefore 0:1.5-290:1.5-29
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationkrb5before 0:1.5-290:1.5-29
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationkrb5-debuginfobefore 0:1.5-290:1.5-29
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationkrb5-develbefore 0:1.5-290:1.5-29
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationkrb5-serverbefore 0:1.5-290:1.5-29

Same product

mit: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2007-0956The telnet daemon (telnetd) in MIT krb5 before 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain system access via a username
    49Plan
  • CVE-2011-0285The process_chpw_request function in schpw.c in the password-changing functionality in kadmind in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 through 1.9
    46Plan
  • CVE-2001-0247Buffer overflows in BSD-based FTP servers allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long pattern string containing a {} se
    46Plan
  • CVE-2002-1235The kadm_ser_in function in (1) the Kerberos v4compatibility administration daemon (kadmind4) in the MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) krb5-1.2.6 and ea
    45Plan
  • CVE-2009-0846The asn1_decode_generaltime function in lib/krb5/asn.1/asn1_decode.c in the ASN.1 GeneralizedTime decoder in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) befor
    43Plan
  • CVE-2008-0947Buffer overflow in the RPC library used by libgssrpc and kadmind in MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.4 through 1.6.3 allows remote attackers to execu
    43Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:krb51.6.dfsg.1-7 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:librpcsecgss0.14-2etch3 · Debian:4.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:krb50:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:krb5-debuginfo0:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:krb5-devel0:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:krb5-libs0:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:krb5-server0:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client_workstationPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:krb5-workstation0:1.5-29 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
C · data can be read
Integrity
C · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
C · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
C
Integrity impact
C
Availability impact
C

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records