Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key auth
Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.
- Published
- Aug 23, 2005
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 7.1% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- —
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 7.1%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| juniper | netscreen screenos | cpe:2.3:o:juniper:netscreen_screenos |
| juniper | netscreen-5gt | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-5gt |
| juniper | netscreen-idp | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-idp |
| juniper | netscreen-idp 10 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-idp_10 |
| juniper | netscreen-idp 100 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-idp_100 |
| juniper | netscreen-idp 1000 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-idp_1000 |
| juniper | netscreen-idp 500 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:netscreen-idp_500 |
| neoteris | instant virtual extranet | cpe:2.3:a:neoteris:instant_virtual_extranet |
| netscreen | ns-10 | cpe:2.3:o:netscreen:ns-10 |
| netscreen | ns-100 | cpe:2.3:o:netscreen:ns-100 |
| netscreen | ns-204 | cpe:2.3:o:netscreen:ns-204 |
| netscreen | ns-500 | cpe:2.3:o:netscreen:ns-500 |
and 4 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- juniper netscreen screenos1.64
- juniper netscreen screenos1.66
- juniper netscreen screenos1.66_r2
- juniper netscreen screenos1.7
- juniper netscreen screenos1.73_r1
- juniper netscreen screenos1.73_r2
- juniper netscreen screenos2.0.1_r8
- juniper netscreen screenos2.1
- juniper netscreen screenos2.1_r6
- juniper netscreen screenos2.1_r7
- juniper netscreen screenos2.10_r3
- juniper netscreen screenos2.10_r4
- juniper netscreen screenos2.5
- juniper netscreen screenos2.5r1
- juniper netscreen screenos2.5r2
- juniper netscreen screenos2.5r6
- juniper netscreen screenos2.6.0
- juniper netscreen screenos2.6.1
- juniper netscreen screenos2.6.1r1
- juniper netscreen screenos2.6.1r10
Same product
juniper: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-0059ScreenOS: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability21Monitor
- CVE-2004-1446Unknown vulnerability in ScreenOS in Juniper Networks NetScreen firewall 3.x through 5.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servic21Monitor
- CVE-2002-1547Netscreen running ScreenOS 4.0.0r6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed SSH packet to the Secure21Monitor
- CVE-2002-2150Firewalls from multiple vendors empty state tables more slowly than they are filled, which allows remote attackers to flood state tables wit21Monitor
- CVE-2002-0891The web interface (WebUI) of NetScreen ScreenOS before 2.6.1r8, and certain 2.8.x and 3.0.x versions before 3.0.3r1, allows remote attackers20Monitor
- CVE-2008-6096Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Juniper NetScreen ScreenOS before 5.4r10, 6.0r6, and 6.1r2 allows remote attackers to inject arb17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2005-08-18 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-5 d
- Published
- TodaySep 30, 2026+7709 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112438068426034&w=2
- secunia.com/advisories/16474/
- securitytracker.com/id?1014728
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.