Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2005-2069· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

pam_ldap and nss_ldap, when used with OpenLDAP and connecting to a slave using TLS, does not use TLS for the subsequent connection if the cl

pam_ldap and nss_ldap, when used with OpenLDAP and connecting to a slave using TLS, does not use TLS for the subsequent connection if the client is referred to a master, which may cause a password to be sent in cleartext and allows remote attackers to sniff the password.

MediumCVSS 5.0 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 30, 2005
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.8% · 86th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.8%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
openldapopenldap
padlnss ldap
padlpam ldap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • padl nss ldapall versions
  • padl pam ldapall versions

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:11libnss-ldapbefore 238-1.1238-1.1
Debian:11libpam-ldapbefore 178-1sarge1178-1sarge1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asnss_ldapbefore 0:207-170:207-17
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asnss_ldap-debuginfobefore 0:207-170:207-17
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asopenldapbefore 0:2.0.27-200:2.0.27-20
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asopenldap-clientsbefore 0:2.0.27-200:2.0.27-20
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asopenldap-debuginfobefore 0:2.0.27-200:2.0.27-20
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asopenldap-develbefore 0:2.0.27-200:2.0.27-20
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asopenldap-serversbefore 0:2.0.27-200:2.0.27-20
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::ascompat-openldapbefore 0:2.1.30-40:2.1.30-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asnss_ldapbefore 0:226-100:226-10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asnss_ldap-debuginfobefore 0:226-100:226-10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldapbefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldap-clientsbefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldap-debuginfobefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldap-develbefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldap-serversbefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asopenldap-servers-sqlbefore 0:2.2.13-40:2.2.13-4

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2022-29155In OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.5.12 and 2.6.x before 2.6.2, a SQL injection vulnerability exists in the experimental back-sql backend to slapd, vi
    58Plan
  • CVE-2020-36228An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to a slapd crash in the Certificate List Exact Assertion processing, r
    55Plan
  • CVE-2020-36221An integer underflow was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to slapd crashes in the Certificate Exact Assertion processing, result
    55Plan
  • CVE-2020-36227A flaw was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to an infinite loop in slapd with the cancel_extop Cancel operation, resulting in de
    53Plan
  • CVE-2020-36222A flaw was discovered in OpenLDAP before 2.4.57 leading to an assertion failure in slapd in the saslAuthzTo validation, resulting in denial
    53Plan
  • CVE-2006-5779OpenLDAP before 2.3.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via LDAP BIND requests with long authcid names, w
    53Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:libnss-ldap238-1.1 · Debian:11Package registry (OSV)
debian:libpam-ldap178-1sarge1 · Debian:11Package registry (OSV)
red hat:compat-openldap0:2.1.30-4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:nss_ldap0:207-17 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:nss_ldap-debuginfo0:207-17 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap0:2.0.27-20 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap-clients0:2.0.27-20 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap-debuginfo0:2.0.27-20 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap-devel0:2.0.27-20 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap-servers0:2.0.27-20 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openldap-servers-sql0:2.2.13-4 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
P · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
P
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records