Multiple stack-based and heap-based buffer overflows in Remote Management authentication (zenrem32.exe) on Novell ZENworks 6.5 Desktop and S
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 50/100)
- A ready-made attack module is public (Metasploit); exploiting it takes no special expertise.
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 66.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 99.2% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Multiple stack-based and heap-based buffer overflows in Remote Management authentication (zenrem32.exe) on Novell ZENworks 6.5 Desktop and Server Management, ZENworks for Desktops 4.x, ZENworks for Servers 3.x, and Remote Management allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) unspecified vectors, (2) type 1 authentication requests, and (3) type 2 authentication requests.
- Published
- May 25, 2005
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 66.1% · 99th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
50
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 20 / 30 · 66.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Weaponized exploit exists
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| novell | zenworks | cpe:2.3:a:novell:zenworks |
| novell | zenworks desktops | cpe:2.3:a:novell:zenworks_desktops |
| novell | zenworks remote management | cpe:2.3:a:novell:zenworks_remote_management |
| novell | zenworks server management | cpe:2.3:a:novell:zenworks_server_management |
| novell | zenworks servers | cpe:2.3:a:novell:zenworks_servers |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- novell zenworks6.5
- novell zenworks desktops3.2
- novell zenworks desktops4.0
- novell zenworks desktops4.0.1
- novell zenworks remote managementall versions
- novell zenworks server management6.5
- novell zenworks servers3.2
Same product
novell: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2006-3425FastPatch for (a) PatchLink Update Server (PLUS) before 6.1 P1 and 6.2.x before 6.2 SR1 P1, and (b) Novell ZENworks 6.2 SR1 and earlier, doe31Monitor
- CVE-2007-1119Unspecified vulnerability in Novell ZENworks 7 Desktop Management Support Pack 1 before Hot patch 3 (ZDM7SP1HP3) allows remote attackers to 25Monitor
- CVE-2006-3426Directory traversal vulnerability in (a) PatchLink Update Server (PLUS) before 6.1 P1 and 6.2.x before 6.2 SR1 P1 and (b) Novell ZENworks 6.21Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2005-3786Nov 23, 2005 · Novell ZENworks for Desktops 4.0.1, ZENworks for Servers 3.0.2, and ZENworks 6.5 Desktop Management does not restrict access to Remote Diagn18Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Weaponized
A ready exploit tool or active in-the-wild use is known for this vulnerability. This should be your top priority.
Evidence
- Metasploit module ×1
- Exploit-DB entry ×2
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2010-07-25 |
| Exploit-DB entry | remote | 2005-08-12 |
| Metasploit module | exploit/windows/novell/zenworks_desktop_agentNovell ZENworks 6.5 Desktop/Server Management Overflowexploit | 2005-05-19 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Metasploit-6 d
- Published
- First PoC+79 d
- TodayOct 22, 2026+7821 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- secunia.com/advisories/15433
- securitytracker.com/id?1014005
- support.novell.com/cgi-bin/search/searchtid.cgi?/10097644.htm
- www.rem0te.com/public/images/zen.pdf
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/13678
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/0571
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/20639
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/20644
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/20645
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.