CVE-2003-0147: OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining…
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 94.3% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: openssl (Debian:12) 0.9.7b-1; openssl (Debian:3.0) 0.9.6c-2.woody.3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Debian:12) 0.9.7b-1; openssl (Debian:3.0) 0.9.6c-2.woody.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on (1) the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and (2) the use of different integer multiplication algorithms ("Karatsuba" and normal).
- Published
- Mar 31, 2003
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 7.0% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
22
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 7.0%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Check your server's TLS configurationRun the SSL check
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| openssl | openssl | cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl |
| openpkg | openpkg | cpe:2.3:a:openpkg:openpkg |
| stunnel | stunnel | cpe:2.3:a:stunnel:stunnel |
Check your server's TLS configuration
The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- openpkg openpkgall versions
- openpkg openpkg1.1
- openpkg openpkg1.2
- openssl openssl0.9.6
- openssl openssl0.9.6a
- openssl openssl0.9.6b
- openssl openssl0.9.6c
- openssl openssl0.9.6d
+12 more rows
- openssl openssl0.9.6e
- openssl openssl0.9.6g
- openssl openssl0.9.6h
- openssl openssl0.9.6i
- openssl openssl0.9.7
- openssl openssl0.9.7a
- stunnel stunnel3.10
- stunnel stunnel3.11
- stunnel stunnel3.12
- stunnel stunnel3.13
- stunnel stunnel3.14
- stunnel stunnel3.15
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | openssl | before 0.9.7b-1 | 0.9.7b-1 |
| Debian:3.0 | openssl | before 0.9.6c-2.woody.3 | 0.9.6c-2.woody.3 |
Same product
openssl: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows…KEV90Now
- CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow65This week
- CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code…65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2003-0078Mar 3, 2003 · ssl3_get_record in s3_pkt.c for OpenSSL before 0.9.7a and 0.9.6 before 0.9.6i does not perform a MAC computation if an incorrect block…24Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2003-0131Mar 24, 2003 · The SSL and TLS components for OpenSSL 0.9.6i and earlier, 0.9.7, and 0.9.7a allow remote attackers to perform an unauthorized RSA private…32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2002-1568Nov 17, 2003 · OpenSSL 0.9.6e uses assertions when detecting buffer overflow attacks instead of less severe mechanisms, which allows remote attackers to…21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:openssl | 0.9.7b-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20030501-01-I
- archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q1/0130.html
- crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/papers/ssl-timing.pdf
- distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000625
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104766550528628&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104792570615648&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104819602408063&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104829040921835&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=104861762028637&w=2
- www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-288
- www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200303-23.xml
- www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/997481
- www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2003:035
- www.openpkg.com/security/advisories/OpenPKG-SA-2003.019.html
- www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030317.txt
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-101.html
- www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-102.html
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/316165/30/25370/threaded
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/316577/30/25310/threaded
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.