Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2002-1012· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Buffer overflow in web server for Tivoli Management Framework (TMF) ManagedNode 3.6.x through 3.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denia

Buffer overflow in web server for Tivoli Management Framework (TMF) ManagedNode 3.6.x through 3.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP GET request.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v2.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Oct 4, 2002
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
3.3% · 88th percentile
CWE
—
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 3.3%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
ibmtivoli management framework

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • ibm tivoli management framework3.6
  • ibm tivoli management framework3.6.1
  • ibm tivoli management framework3.7
  • ibm tivoli management framework3.7.1

Same product

ibm: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2011-1220Stack-based buffer overflow in lcfd.exe in Tivoli Endpoint in IBM Tivoli Management Framework 3.7.1, 4.1, 4.1.1, and 4.3.1 allows remote aut
    55Plan
  • CVE-2011-2330Tivoli Endpoint in IBM Tivoli Management Framework 3.7.1, 4.1, 4.1.1, and 4.3.1 has an unspecified "built-in account" that is "trivially" ac
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2000-1239The HTTP interface of Tivoli Lightweight Client Framework (LCF) in IBM Tivoli Management Framework 3.7.1 sets http_disable to zero at instal
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2002-1011Buffer overflow in web server for Tivoli Management Framework (TMF) Endpoint 3.6.x through 3.7.1, before Fixpack 2, allows remote attackers
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2005-2170The LCF component (lcfd) in IBM Tivoli Management Framework Endpoint allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process exit and
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
P · data can be read
Integrity
P · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
P · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
P
Integrity impact
P
Availability impact
P

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records