Vvveb: Stored XSS via Comment Author Field
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.27% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: givanz Vvveb 1.0.8.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to givanz Vvveb 1.0.8.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.1, a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Vvveb CMS comment submission flow. The author field is submitted by an unauthenticated user on any public post page, stored without sanitization, and later rendered unsanitized in two distinct sinks: This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.8.1.
- Published
- May 15, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 18th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-79
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Limit the impact of XSS
This is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A well-configured Content-Security-Policy doesn't fix it, but greatly reduces its impact. Check your site's CSP and other security headers for free.
Check security headersVersions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
givanz Vvveb
- < 1.0.8.1affected
Same product
givanz: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-41930Vvveb < 1.0.8.2 Hard-coded Credentials Information Disclosure via phpMyAdmin36Monitor
- CVE-2026-39918Vvveb < 1.0.8.1 Code Injection via Installation Endpoint36Monitor
- CVE-2026-54612Vvveb: Authenticated editor path traversal to PHP file write/RCE via data-v-save-global35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-41935May 14, 2026 · Vvveb < 1.0.8.3 Uncontrolled Recursion Denial of Service28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-41937May 14, 2026 · Vvveb < 1.0.8.3 Unrestricted File Upload RCE via Plugin Upload34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-44826May 15, 2026 · Vvveb: Vvveb CMS — Negative-quantity cart manipulation allows creation of orders with negative grand totals30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| givanz Vvveb | 1.0.8.1 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-55230139 days apartVvveb: Stored XSS in Vvveb via sanitizeHTML() filter bypass using a quoted greater-than character34Monitor
- CVE-2026-54506125 days apartVvveb: Stored XSS via sanitizeHTML() bypass in user profile bio field30Monitor
- CVE-2026-456220 days apartVvveb: Unauthenticated reflected XSS in public product return form via customer_order_id21Monitor
- CVE-2026-419321 days apartVvveb < 1.0.8.3 Stored XSS via Signup Controller21Monitor
- CVE-2026-456160 days apartVvveb: Stored XSS in Posts allows privilege escalation via post editor20Monitor
- CVE-2026-419298 days apartVvveb < 1.0.8.2 Unauthenticated Reflected XSS via Visual Editor20Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-79 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;Fixed
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.