iControl REST and TMSH vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.40% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can create SNMP configuration objects through iControl REST or the TMOS shell (tmsh) resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
- Published
- May 13, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 33th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-77
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · f5
- 8.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| f5 | big-ip access policy manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager |
| f5 | big-ip advanced firewall manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_firewall_manager |
| f5 | big-ip advanced web application firewall | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall |
| f5 | big-ip analytics | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_analytics |
| f5 | big-ip application acceleration manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_acceleration_manager |
| f5 | big-ip application security manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_security_manager |
| f5 | big-ip application visibility and reporting | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_visibility_and_reporting |
| f5 | big-ip automation toolchain | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_automation_toolchain |
| f5 | big-ip carrier-grade nat | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_carrier-grade_nat |
| f5 | big-ip container ingress services | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_container_ingress_services |
| f5 | big-ip ddos hybrid defender | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_ddos_hybrid_defender |
| f5 | big-ip domain name system | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_domain_name_system |
and 10 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- f5 big-ip access policy manager16.1.0 and later · up to 16.1.6 inclusive
- f5 big-ip access policy manager17.1.0 and later · up to 17.1.3 inclusive
- f5 big-ip access policy manager17.5.0 and later · up to 17.5.1 inclusive
- f5 big-ip access policy manager21.0.0
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager16.1.0 and later · up to 16.1.6 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager17.1.0 and later · up to 17.1.3 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager17.5.0 and later · up to 17.5.1 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager21.0.0
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall16.1.0 and later · up to 16.1.6 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall17.1.0 and later · up to 17.1.3 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall17.5.0 and later · up to 17.5.1 inclusive
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall21.0.0
- f5 big-ip analytics16.1.0 and later · up to 16.1.6 inclusive
- f5 big-ip analytics17.1.0 and later · up to 17.1.3 inclusive
- f5 big-ip analytics17.5.0 and later · up to 17.5.1 inclusive
- f5 big-ip analytics21.0.0
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager17.1.0 and later · up to 17.1.3 inclusive
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager17.5.0 and later · up to 17.5.1 inclusive
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager16.1.0 and later · up to 16.1.6 inclusive
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager21.0.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (f5). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
F5 BIG-IP
- 21.1.0 and laternot affected
- 21.0.0 and later · before 21.0.0.2affected
- 17.5.0 and later · before 17.5.1.6affected
- 17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.3.2affected
- 16.1.0 and lateraffected
F5 BIG-IQ
- 8.4.0 and lateraffected
Same product
f5: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-1388On F5 BIG-IP 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, 13.1.x versions prior KEV99Now
- CVE-2021-22986On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 KEV99Now
- CVE-2020-5902In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.1, the Traffic Management User InteKEV99Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-40629May 13, 2026 · BIG-IP SSL/TLS vulnerability34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-40631May 13, 2026 · BIG-IP iControl SOAP vulnerability34Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-40699May 13, 2026 · BIG-IP Configuration utility vulnerability28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- F5finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-31644371 days apartAppliance mode BIG-IP iControl REST and tmsh vulnerability41Plan
- CVE-2026-419530 days apartBIG-IP Privilege Escalation vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2025-23239462 days apartBIG-IP iControl REST vulnerability34Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- LDAP InjectionCAPEC-136likelihood: High · High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- IMAP/SMTP Command InjectionCAPEC-183Medium
- Command InjectionCAPEC-248likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Terminal DevicesCAPEC-40likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Configuration FilesCAPEC-75likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.