dnsmasqs extract_name() function can be abused to cause a heap buffer overflow, allowing an attacker to inject false DNS cache entries, whic
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.61% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: azl3 dnsmasq 2.90-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.92-1; azl3 dnsmasq 2.92-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.92-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 dnsmasq 2.90-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.92-1; azl3 dnsmasq 2.92-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 2.92-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
dnsmasqs extract_name() function can be abused to cause a heap buffer overflow, allowing an attacker to inject false DNS cache entries, which could result in DNS lookups to redirect to an attacker-controlled IP address, or to cause a DoS.
- Published
- May 11, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 20, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 48th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (certcc). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
dnsmasq dnsmasq
- before 2.92rel2affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | dnsmasq | before 2.90-7.el10_2 | 2.90-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | dnsmasq-utils | before 2.90-7.el10_2 | 2.90-7.el10_2 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dnsmasq | before 2.79-36.el8_10 | 2.79-36.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | dnsmasq-utils | before 2.79-36.el8_10 | 2.79-36.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dnsmasq | before 2.85-18.el9_8.1 | 2.85-18.el9_8.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | dnsmasq-utils | before 2.85-18.el9_8.1 | 2.85-18.el9_8.1 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | dnsmasq | before 2.91-r1 | 2.91-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.24 | dnsmasq | before 2.92_p2-r0 | 2.92_p2-r0 |
| Debian:12 | dnsmasq | before 2.90-4~deb12u2 | 2.90-4~deb12u2 |
| Debian:13 | dnsmasq | before 2.91-1+deb13u1 | 2.91-1+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | dnsmasq | before 2.92-5 | 2.92-5 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | dnsmasq | before 2.93-160000.1.1 | 2.93-160000.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | dnsmasq | before 2.92rel2-1.1 | 2.92rel2-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | dnsmasq | before 0:2.90-7.el10_2 | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | dnsmasq-debuginfo | before 0:2.90-7.el10_2 | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | dnsmasq-debugsource | before 0:2.90-7.el10_2 | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | dnsmasq-utils | before 0:2.90-7.el10_2 | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | dnsmasq-utils-debuginfo | before 0:2.90-7.el10_2 | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | dnsmasq | before 0:2.79-36.el8_10 | 0:2.79-36.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | dnsmasq-debuginfo | before 0:2.79-36.el8_10 | 0:2.79-36.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | dnsmasq-debugsource | before 0:2.79-36.el8_10 | 0:2.79-36.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | dnsmasq-utils | before 0:2.79-36.el8_10 | 0:2.79-36.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | dnsmasq-utils-debuginfo | before 0:2.79-36.el8_10 | 0:2.79-36.el8_10 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | dnsmasq | before 0:2.85-18.el9_8.1 | 0:2.85-18.el9_8.1 |
+15
Same product
dnsmasq: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-4892A heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the DHCPv6 implementation of dnsmasq allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code with33Monitor
- CVE-2026-4890A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the DNSSEC validation of dnsmasq allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a craft30Monitor
- CVE-2026-5172A buffer overflow in dnsmasq’s extract_addresses() function allows an attacker to trigger a heap out-of-bounds read and crash by exploiting 29Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2005-0876May 2, 2005 · Off-by-one buffer overflow in Dnsmasq before 2.21 may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via the DHCP lease file.21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2006-2017Apr 25, 2006 · Dnsmasq 2.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a DHCP client broadcast reply request.21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-4891May 11, 2026 · A heap-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the DNSSEC validation of dnsmasq allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 dnsmasq 2.90-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.92-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 dnsmasq 2.92-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 2.92-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:dnsmasq | 2.90-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:dnsmasq-utils | 2.90-7.el10_2 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:dnsmasq | 2.91-r1 · Alpine:v3.22 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:dnsmasq | 2.90-4~deb12u2 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:dnsmasq | 2.92rel2-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dnsmasq | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dnsmasq-debuginfo | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dnsmasq-debugsource | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dnsmasq-utils | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:dnsmasq-utils-debuginfo | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:dnsmasq | 0:2.90-7.el10_2 · Rocky Linux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:dnsmasq | 2.93-slfo.1.1_1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-06-01 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+20 d
- TodayOct 19, 2026+161 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.