Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2025-46397· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Xfig: xfig: stack-overflow allows possible code execution via local input manipulation

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.30% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: transfig (AlmaLinux:8) 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_10; transfig (AlmaLinux:9) 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7; fig2dev (Debian:11) 1:3.2.8-3+deb11u3.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to transfig (AlmaLinux:8) 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_10; transfig (AlmaLinux:9) 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7; fig2dev (Debian:11) 1:3.2.8-3+deb11u3 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A flaw was found in xfig. This vulnerability allows possible code execution via local input manipulation via bezier_spline function.

HighCVSS 7.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 23, 2025
Updated
Jun 30, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 21th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · redhat
7.8
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-46397

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
fig2dev projectfig2dev
redhatenterprise linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • fig2dev project fig2dev3.2.9a
  • redhat enterprise linux6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux8.0
  • redhat enterprise linux9.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

    • all versionsunknown
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    • 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_10 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

    • 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support

    • 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.1 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support

    • 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.1 and laternot affected · rpm
  • sourceforge.net/projects/mcj/ xfig

    • up to and including 3.2.9aaffected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8transfigbefore 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_101:3.2.6a-5.el8_10
AlmaLinux:9transfigbefore 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_71:3.2.7b-11.el9_7
Debian:11fig2devbefore 1:3.2.8-3+deb11u31:3.2.8-3+deb11u3
Debian:12fig2devbefore 1:3.2.8b-3+deb12u21:3.2.8b-3+deb12u2
Debian:13fig2devbefore 1:3.2.9a-41:3.2.9a-4
openSUSE:Tumbleweedtransfigbefore 3.2.9a-3.13.2.9a-3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crbtransfigbefore 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_101:3.2.6a-5.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crbtransfig-debuginfobefore 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_101:3.2.6a-5.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crbtransfig-debugsourcebefore 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_101:3.2.6a-5.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbtransfigbefore 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_71:3.2.7b-11.el9_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbtransfig-debuginfobefore 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_71:3.2.7b-11.el9_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbtransfig-debugsourcebefore 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_71:3.2.7b-11.el9_7
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.4::crbtransfigbefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.1
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.4::crbtransfig-debuginfobefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.1
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.4::crbtransfig-debugsourcebefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_4.1
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.6::crbtransfigbefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.1
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.6::crbtransfig-debuginfobefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.1
Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.6::crbtransfig-debugsourcebefore 1:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.11:3.2.7b-10.el9_6.1
Rocky Linux:8transfigbefore 1:3.2.6a-5.el8_101:3.2.6a-5.el8_10
Rocky Linux:9transfigbefore 1:3.2.7b-11.el9_71:3.2.7b-11.el9_7
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6transfigbefore 3.2.9a-150600.3.5.13.2.9a-150600.3.5.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6transfigbefore 3.2.9a-150600.3.5.13.2.9a-150600.3.5.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5transfigbefore 3.2.8b-2.26.13.2.8b-2.26.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2021-37530Jan 12, 2022 · A denial of service vulnerabiity exists in fig2dev through 3.28a due to a segfault in the open_stream function in readpics.c.
    22Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-31162Mar 28, 2025 · fig2dev float point exception
    26Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-46398Apr 23, 2025 · Xfig: fig2dev stack-overflow via read_objects
    22Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:transfig1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
debian:fig2dev1:3.2.8b-3+deb12u2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:transfig3.2.9a-150600.3.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:transfig1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:transfig-debuginfo1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:transfig-debugsource1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crbPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:transfig1:3.2.7b-11.el9_7 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
suse:transfig3.2.9a-150600.3.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Fixed

c
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {  return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records