An issue was discovered in Ollama before 0.1.46.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 84.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: github.com/ollama/ollama (Go) 0.1.46; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241101T215616-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/ollama/ollama (Go) 0.1.46; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241101T215616-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5) 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An issue was discovered in Ollama before 0.1.46. An attacker can use two HTTP requests to upload a malformed GGUF file containing just 4 bytes starting with the GGUF custom magic header. By leveraging a custom Modelfile that includes a FROM statement pointing to the attacker-controlled blob file, the attacker can crash the application through the CreateModel route, leading to a segmentation fault (signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation).
- Published
- Oct 31, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.4% · 84th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-125
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ollama | ollama | cpe:2.3:a:ollama:ollama |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ollama ollamabefore 0.1.46
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/ollama/ollama | before 0.1.46 | 0.1.46 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241101T215616-1.1 | 0.0.20241101T215616-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 12 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241104T154416-5.1 | 0.0.20241104T154416-5.1 |
Same product
ollama: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-37032Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles62This week
- CVE-2026-42249Remote Code Execution in Ollama via Update Mechanism40Plan
- CVE-2026-42248Missing Signature Verification for Updates in Ollama40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-45436Aug 28, 2024 · extractFromZipFile in model.go in Ollama before 0.1.47 can extract members of a ZIP archive outside of the parent directory.31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-39719Oct 31, 2024 · An issue was discovered in Ollama through 0.3.14.31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-39721Oct 31, 2024 · An issue was discovered in Ollama before 0.1.34.31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:github.com/ollama/ollama | 0.1.46 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241104T154416-150000.1.12.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-12055140 days apartDoS using malicious gguf model file in ollama/ollama30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds ReadCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.