Improper input validation in the GPU driver could allow an attacker to exploit a heap overflow potentially resulting in arbitrary code execu
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper input validation in the GPU driver could allow an attacker to exploit a heap overflow potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
- Published
- Sep 6, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 6th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1285
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · AMD
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (AMD). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AMD AMD Athlon™ 3000 Series Desktop Processors with Radeon™ Graphics
- Radeon Software for Linux 25.10.xnot affected
AMD AMD Athlon™ 3000 Series Mobile Processors with Radeon™ Graphics
- Radeon Software for Linux 25.10.xnot affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI210
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI250
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI300A
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI300X
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI308X
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Instinct™ MI325X
- ROCm 6.4not affected
AMD AMD Radeon™ PRO V520 Graphics Products
- Contact your AMD Customer Engineering representativenot affected
AMD AMD Radeon™ PRO V620 Graphics Products
- Contact your AMD Customer Engineering representativenot affected
AMD AMD Radeon™ PRO V710 Graphics Products
- Contact your AMD Customer Engineering representativenot affected
AMD AMD Radeon™ PRO VII
- Radeon Software for Linux 25.10.1not affected
Same product
amd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-0432Incorrect default permissions in the installation directory for the AMD chipset driver could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalati34Monitor
- CVE-2024-36352Improper input validation in the AMD Graphics Driver could allow an attacker to supply a specially crafted pointer, potentially leading to a33Monitor
- CVE-2024-36320Integer Overflow within atihdwt6.sys can allow a local attacker to cause out of bound read/write potentially leading to loss of confidential28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-36353Mar 2, 2025 · Insufficient clearing of GPU global memory could allow a malicious process running on the same GPU to read left over memory values potential26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-29949Feb 10, 2026 · Insufficient input parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader (legacy recovery mode only) could allow an attacker to w19Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-48515Feb 10, 2026 · Insufficient parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader could allow an attacker with access to SPIROM upgrade to overw21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1285 · Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in InputCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.