Race Condition allows Unauthorized Outside Collaborator
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 16/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.16% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. A user must open a link or visit a page. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: GitHub Enterprise Server 3.10.4, 3.11.1, 3.8.12.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to GitHub Enterprise Server 3.10.4, 3.11.1, 3.8.12 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A race condition in GitHub Enterprise Server allows an outside collaborator to be added while a repository is being transferred. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server since 3.8 and was fixed in version 3.8.12, 3.9.7, 3.10.4, and 3.11.1.
- Published
- Dec 21, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 5th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-367
Report tools
Action score
16
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.0
- CNA · GitHub_P
- 5.8
- 1.8 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| github | enterprise server | cpe:2.3:a:github:enterprise_server |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- github enterprise server3.8.0 and later · before 3.8.12
- github enterprise server3.9.0 and later · before 3.9.7
- github enterprise server3.10.0 and later · before 3.10.4
- github enterprise server3.11.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_P). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
GitHub Enterprise Server
- 3.8 and later · up to and including 3.8.11affected · semverfixed in 3.8.12
- 3.9 and later · up to and including 3.9.6affected · semverfixed in 3.9.7
- 3.10 and later · up to and including 3.10.3affected · semverfixed in 3.10.4
- 3.11 and later · up to and including 3.11.0affected · semverfixed in 3.11.1
Same product
github: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-0200Unsafe Reflection in Github Enterprise Server leading to Command Injection61This week
- CVE-2024-0507Privilege Escalation by Code Injection in the Management Console in GitHub Enterprise Server55Plan
- CVE-2024-9487An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed46Plan
- CVE-2024-4985An authentication bypass vulnerability was present in the GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) when utilizing SAML single sign-on authentication 41Plan
- CVE-2022-23739Incorrect authorization check in GitHub Enterprise Server leading to escalation of privileges in GraphQL API requests from GitHub Apps using scoped user-to-serv39Monitor
- CVE-2022-46255Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory in GitHub Enterprise Server leading to RCE39Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.10.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.11.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.8.12 | Vendor (CNA) |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.9.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- inspector-ambitiousfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2023-466490 days apartRace Condition allows Administrative Access on Organization Repositories28Monitor
- CVE-2024-2440120 days apartRace Condition was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed maintaining admin permissions23Monitor
- CVE-2023-66900 days apartA race condition in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed an existing admin to maintain permissions on transferred repositories by making a Graph8Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-367 · Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race ConditionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.