Samba: ad dc password exposure to privileged users and rodcs
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 71.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: samba (Alpine:v3.18) 4.18.8-r0; samba (Debian:12) 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1; samba (Debian:13) 2:4.19.1+dfsg-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to samba (Alpine:v3.18) 4.18.8-r0; samba (Debian:12) 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1; samba (Debian:13) 2:4.19.1+dfsg-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A design flaw was found in Samba's DirSync control implementation, which exposes passwords and secrets in Active Directory to privileged users and Read-Only Domain Controllers (RODCs). This flaw allows RODCs and users possessing the GET_CHANGES right to access all attributes, including sensitive secrets and passwords. Even in a default setup, RODC DC accounts, which should only replicate some passwords, can gain access to all domain secrets, including the vital krbtgt, effectively eliminating the RODC / DC distinction. Furthermore, the vulnerability fails to account for error conditions (fail open), like out-of-memory situations, potentially granting access to secret attributes, even under low-privileged attacker influence.
- Published
- Nov 7, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.3% · 71th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-787
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.5
- CNA · redhat
- 7.5
- 1.0 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| samba | samba | cpe:2.3:a:samba:samba |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- samba samba4.0.0 and later · before 4.17.12
- samba samba4.18.0 and later · before 4.18.8
- samba samba4.19.0 and later · before 4.19.1
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Fedora Fedora
- all versionsaffected
n/a samba
- 4.19.1, 4.18.8, 4.17.12not affected
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Storage 3
- all versionsunknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.18 | samba | from 4.0.0 · before 4.18.8-r0 | 4.18.8-r0 |
| Debian:12 | samba | before 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 | 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | samba | before 2:4.19.1+dfsg-1 | 2:4.19.1+dfsg-1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | samba | before 4.19.1+git.312.c912b3d2ef6-1.1 | 4.19.1+git.312.c912b3d2ef6-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | samba | before 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150300.3.63.1 | 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150300.3.63.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | samba | before 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150400.3.31.1 | 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150400.3.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | samba | before 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150400.3.31.1 | 4.15.13+git.691.3d3cea0641-150400.3.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | samba | before 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 | 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | samba | before 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 | 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 |
Same product
samba: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-7494Samba since version 3.5.0 and before 4.6.4, 4.5.10 and 4.4.14 is vulnerable to remote code execution vulnerability, allowing a malicious cliKEV99Now
- CVE-2015-0240The Netlogon server implementation in smbd in Samba 3.5.x and 3.6.x before 3.6.25, 4.0.x before 4.0.25, 4.1.x before 4.1.17, and 4.2.x befor66This week
- CVE-2003-0085Buffer overflow in the SMB/CIFS packet fragment re-assembly code for SMB daemon (smbd) in Samba before 2.2.8, and Samba-TNG before 0.3.1, al66This week
- CVE-2003-0201Buffer overflow in the call_trans2open function in trans2.c for Samba 2.2.x before 2.2.8a, 2.0.10 and earlier 2.0.x versions, and Samba-TNG 65This week
- CVE-2007-2446Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the NDR parsing in smbd in Samba 3.0.0 through 3.0.25rc3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary63This week
- CVE-2012-1182The RPC code generator in Samba 3.x before 3.4.16, 3.5.x before 3.5.14, and 3.6.x before 3.6.4 does not implement validation of an array len62This week
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:samba | 4.18.8-r0 · Alpine:v3.18 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:samba | 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:samba | 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:samba | 4.17.9+git.421.abde31ca5c2-150500.3.11.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.