File and Directory Permission Vulnerability in JP1/Performance Management
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server 11-50-16; Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications 11-50-16, 12-00-14; Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB 11-50-16, 12-00-14.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server 11-50-16; Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications 11-50-16, 12-00-14; Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB 11-50-16, 12-00-14 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Hitachi JP1/Performance Management on Windows allows File Manipulation.This issue affects JP1/Performance Management - Manager: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Base: from 09-00 through 10-50-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server: from 11-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM Lotus Domino: from 10-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Exchange Server: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Internet Information Server: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Platform: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Service Response: from 09-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Transaction System: from 11-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Microsoft(R) SQL Server: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Oracle: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Platform: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Virtual Machine: from 10-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Domino: from 09-00 through 09-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere Application Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere MQ: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for JP1/AJS3: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for OpenTP1: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle WebLogic Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for uCosminexus Application Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Virtual Machine: from 09-00 through 09-01-*.
- Published
- Oct 2, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 9th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-276
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.8
- CNA · Hitachi
- 8.4
- 0.6 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hitachi | jp1\/performance management | cpe:2.3:a:hitachi:jp1\/performance_management |
| microsoft | windows | cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- hitachi jp1/performance managementall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Hitachi). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server
- 11-00 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Domino
- 09-00 and later · up to and including 09-00-*affected
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications
- 09-00 and later · before 11-50affected
- 11-50 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
- 12-00 and later · before 12-00-14affectedfixed in 12-00-14
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB
- 09-00 and later · before 11-50affected
- 11-50 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
- 12-00 and later · before 12-00-14affectedfixed in 12-00-14
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM Lotus Domino
- 10-00 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere Application Server
- 09-00 and later · up to and including 10-00-*affected
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere MQ
- 09-00 and later · up to and including 10-00-*affected
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for JP1/AJS3
- 09-00 and later · up to and including 10-00-*affected
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Exchange Server
- 09-00 and later · before 11-50affected
- 11-50 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
- 12-00 and later · before 12-00-14affectedfixed in 12-00-14
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Internet Information Server
- 09-00 and later · before 11-50affected
- 11-50 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
- 12-00 and later · before 12-00-14affectedfixed in 12-00-14
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server
- 09-00 and later · before 11-50affected
- 11-50 and later · before 11-50-16affectedfixed in 11-50-16
- 12-00 and later · before 12-00-14affectedfixed in 12-00-14
- 12-50 and later · before 12-50-07affectedfixed in 12-50-07
Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for OpenTP1
- 09-00 and later · up to and including 10-00-*affected
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM Lotus Domino | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Exchange Server | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Exchange Server | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Internet Information Server | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Internet Information Server | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 12-50-07 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle | 12-10-08 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Platform | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Platform | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Platform | 12-50-07 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Service Response | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Transaction System | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Transaction System | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Manager | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Manager | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Manager | 12-10-08 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Manager | 12-50-07 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 12-00-14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Microsoft(R) SQL Server | 12-50-07 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hitachi JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Oracle | 11-50-16 | Vendor (CNA) |
+9
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Taku Toyamafinder
- Masaya Suzukifinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-276 · Incorrect Default PermissionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.