Persistent XSS in the user form
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Zabbix Zabbix 4.0.46rc1, 5.0.35rc1, 6.0.18rc1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Zabbix Zabbix 4.0.46rc1, 5.0.35rc1, 6.0.18rc1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Stored or persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) is a type of XSS where the attacker first sends the payload to the web application, then the application saves the payload (e.g., in a database or server-side text files), and finally, the application unintentionally executes the payload for every victim visiting its web pages.
- Published
- Jul 13, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 46th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.4
- CNA · Zabbix
- 5.4
- agree
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| zabbix | frontend | cpe:2.3:a:zabbix:frontend |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- zabbix frontend4.0.0 and later · up to 4.0.45 inclusive
- zabbix frontend5.0.0 and later · up to 5.0.33 inclusive
- zabbix frontend6.0.0 and later · up to 6.0.16 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Zabbix). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Zabbix Zabbix
- 4.0.0 and later · up to and including 4.0.45affected · gitfixed in 4.0.46rc1
- 5.0.0 and later · up to and including 5.0.33affected · gitfixed in 5.0.35rc1
- 6.0.0 and later · up to and including 6.0.16affected · gitfixed in 6.0.18rc1
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:10 | zabbix | before 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1+deb10u2 | 1:4.0.4+dfsg-1+deb10u2 |
| Debian:11 | zabbix | before 1:5.0.44+dfsg-1+deb11u1 | 1:5.0.44+dfsg-1+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | zabbix | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | zabbix | before 1:6.0.23+dfsg-1 | 1:6.0.23+dfsg-1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP4 | zabbix | before 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 | 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 |
| SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP4 | zabbix | before 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 | 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 |
Same product
zabbix: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-43515X-Forwarded-For header is active by default causes access to Zabbix sites in maintenance mode39Monitor
- CVE-2025-27232Frontend arbitrary file read in oauth.authorize action27Monitor
- CVE-2025-49643Frontend DoS vulnerability due to asymmetric resource consumption24Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-24918Mar 9, 2022 · Reflected XSS in item configuration window of Zabbix Frontend17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-24919Mar 9, 2022 · Reflected XSS in graph configuration window of Zabbix Frontend17Monitor
- Later →CVE-2023-29455Jul 13, 2023 · Reflected XSS in several fields of graph form24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Zabbix Zabbix | 4.0.46rc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 5.0.35rc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 6.0.18rc1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:zabbix | 1:6.0.23+dfsg-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:zabbix | 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:zabbix | 4.0.47-bp155.3.3.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.