SHARP Multifunction Printer - Command Injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Command injection vulnerability in nw_interface.html in SHARP multifunction printers (MFPs)'s Digital Full-color Multifunctional System 202 or earlier, 120 or earlier, 600 or earlier, 121 or earlier, 500 or earlier, 402 or earlier, 790 or earlier, and Digital Multifunctional System (Monochrome) 200 or earlier, 211 or earlier, 102 or earlier, 453 or earlier, 400 or earlier, 202 or earlier, 602 or earlier, 500 or earlier, 401 or earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.
- Published
- Dec 16, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.2% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-77
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.2
- CNA · ZUSO ART
- 9.1
- 1.9 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| sharp | bp-30c25 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30c25_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30c25 | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30c25 |
| sharp | bp-30c25t firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30c25t_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30c25t | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30c25t |
| sharp | bp-30c25y firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30c25y_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30c25y | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30c25y |
| sharp | bp-30c25z firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30c25z_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30c25z | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30c25z |
| sharp | bp-30m28 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30m28_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30m28 | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30m28 |
| sharp | bp-30m28t firmware | cpe:2.3:o:sharp:bp-30m28t_firmware |
| sharp | bp-30m28t | cpe:2.3:h:sharp:bp-30m28t |
and 188 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- sharp bp-30c25 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30c25t firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30c25y firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30c25z firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m28 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m28t firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m31 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m31t firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m35 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-30m35t firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c26 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c31 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c36 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c45 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c55 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50c65 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50m26 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50m31 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50m36 firmwareall versions
- sharp bp-50m45 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ZUSO ART). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
SHARP SHARP multifunction printers
- Digital Full-color Multifunctional System and later · up to and including 202affected
- Digital Multifunctional System (Monochrome) and later · up to and including 200affected
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- LDAP InjectionCAPEC-136likelihood: High · High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- IMAP/SMTP Command InjectionCAPEC-183Medium
- Command InjectionCAPEC-248likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Terminal DevicesCAPEC-40likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Configuration FilesCAPEC-75likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.