Rockwell Automation Logix Controllers Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 81.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A malformed Class 3 common industrial protocol message with a cached connection can cause a denial-of-service condition in Rockwell Automation Logix Controllers, resulting in a major nonrecoverable fault. If the target device becomes unavailable, a user would have to clear the fault and redownload the user project file to bring the device back online.
- Published
- Jun 2, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.1% · 81th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.6
- CNA · icscert
- 6.8
- 1.8 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5380 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5380_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5380 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5380 |
| rockwellautomation | compact guardlogix 5380 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:compact_guardlogix_5380_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | compact guardlogix 5380 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:compact_guardlogix_5380 |
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5480 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5480_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5480 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5480 |
| rockwellautomation | controllogix 5580 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:controllogix_5580_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | controllogix 5580 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:controllogix_5580 |
| rockwellautomation | guardlogix 5580 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:guardlogix_5580_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | guardlogix 5580 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:guardlogix_5580 |
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5370 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5370_firmware |
| rockwellautomation | compactlogix 5370 | cpe:2.3:h:rockwellautomation:compactlogix_5370 |
and 6 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rockwellautomation compact guardlogix 5370 firmwarebefore 34.011
- rockwellautomation compact guardlogix 5380 firmwarebefore 33.011
- rockwellautomation compactlogix 5370 firmwarebefore 34.011
- rockwellautomation compactlogix 5380 firmwarebefore 33.011
- rockwellautomation compactlogix 5480 firmwarebefore 33.011
- rockwellautomation controllogix 5570 firmwarebefore 34.011
- rockwellautomation controllogix 5580 firmwarebefore 33.011
- rockwellautomation guardlogix 5570 firmwarebefore 34.011
- rockwellautomation guardlogix 5580 firmwarebefore 33.011
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (icscert). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Rockwell Automation Compact GuardLogix 5370 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 33.013affected
Rockwell Automation Compact GuardLogix 5380 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 32.013affected
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 33.013affected
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5380 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 32.013affected
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5480 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 32.013affected
Rockwell Automation ControlLogix 5570 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 33.013affected
Rockwell Automation ControlLogix 5580 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 32.013affected
Rockwell Automation GuardLogix 5570 controllers
- 33.013affected
Rockwell Automation GuardLogix 5580 controllers
- unspecified and later · up to and including 32.013affected
Same product
rockwellautomation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-8626Logix Controllers Vulnerable to Denial-of-Service Vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2024-6077Rockwell Automation ControlLogix/GuardLogix 5580 and CompactLogix/Compact GuardLogix® 5380 Vulnerable to DoS vulnerability via CIP34Monitor
- CVE-2024-7515Rockwell Automation ControlLogix/GuardLogix 5580 and CompactLogix/Compact GuardLogix® 5380 Controller Denial-of-Service Vulnerability via Input Validation34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2017-6024May 5, 2017 · A Resource Exhaustion issue was discovered in Rockwell Automation ControlLogix 5580 controllers V28.011, V28.012, and V28.013; ControlLogix 24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-7507Aug 14, 2024 · Rockwell Automation ControlLogix/GuardLogix 5580 and CompactLogix/Compact GuardLogix® 5380 Controller Denial-of-Service Vulnerability via Input Validation34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) { return node.children.map(expand);}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) { if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep"); return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.