IBM Jazz Foundation products could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.82% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 56.5% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
IBM Jazz Foundation products could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM X-Force ID: 183315.
- Published
- Jan 27, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 56th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1021
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.4
- CNA · ibm
- 5.4
- agree
CVSS:3.0/S:C/A:N/UI:R/AC:L/I:L/C:L/PR:L/AV:N/E:U/RC:C/RL:O
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ibm | collaborative lifecycle management | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:collaborative_lifecycle_management |
| ibm | engineering insights | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:engineering_insights |
| ibm | engineering lifecycle management | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:engineering_lifecycle_management |
| ibm | engineering requirements management doors next | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:engineering_requirements_management_doors_next |
| ibm | engineering test management | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:engineering_test_management |
| ibm | engineering workflow management | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:engineering_workflow_management |
| ibm | global configuration management | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:global_configuration_management |
| ibm | rational engineering lifecycle manager | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:rational_engineering_lifecycle_manager |
| ibm | rational quality manager | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:rational_quality_manager |
| ibm | rhapsody design manager | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:rhapsody_design_manager |
| ibm | rhapsody model manager | cpe:2.3:a:ibm:rhapsody_model_manager |
Do you have framing protection?
Clickjacking protection needs CSP frame-ancestors or X-Frame-Options. Check for free whether your site sends them.
Check security headersAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ibm collaborative lifecycle management6.0.2
- ibm collaborative lifecycle management6.0.6
- ibm collaborative lifecycle management6.0.6.1
- ibm engineering insights7.0
- ibm engineering lifecycle management7.0
- ibm engineering requirements management doors next6.0.2
- ibm engineering requirements management doors next6.0.6
- ibm engineering requirements management doors next6.0.6.1
- ibm engineering requirements management doors next7.0
- ibm engineering test management7.0.0
- ibm engineering workflow management6.0.2
- ibm engineering workflow management6.0.6
- ibm engineering workflow management6.0.6.1
- ibm engineering workflow management7.0
- ibm engineering workflow management7.0.2
- ibm global configuration managementall versions
- ibm rational engineering lifecycle manager6.0.2
- ibm rational engineering lifecycle manager6.0.6
- ibm rational engineering lifecycle manager6.0.6.1
- ibm rational quality manager6.0.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization
- 7.0affected
IBM Engineering Test Management
- 7.0.0affected
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
- 7.0, 7.0.2affected
IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management
- 6.0.2, 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1affected
IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation
- 6.0.2, 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0affected
IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager
- 7.0affected
IBM Rational Quality Manager
- 6.0.2, 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1affected
IBM Rational Rhapsody Design Manager
- 6.0.2, 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1affected
IBM Rational Rhapsody Model Manager
- 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 6.0.2affected
IBM Rational Team Concert
- 6.0.2, 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1affected
Same product
ibm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-4495IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper access co36Monitor
- CVE-2020-4965IBM Jazz Team Server products use weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive inf30Monitor
- CVE-2021-20371IBM Jazz Foundation and IBM Engineering products could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when an error message is retu26Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-4733Jan 8, 2021 · IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to cross-site scripting.21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-4524Jan 27, 2021 · IBM Jazz Foundation products is vulnerable to cross-site scripting.21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2020-4855Jan 27, 2021 · IBM Jazz Foundation products is vulnerable to cross-site scripting.21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1021 · Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or FramesCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ClickjackingCAPEC-103likelihood: Medium · High
- Flash File OverlayCAPEC-181Medium
- iFrame OverlayCAPEC-222likelihood: Medium · High
- Task ImpersonationCAPEC-504likelihood: Medium · High
- TapjackingCAPEC-506likelihood: Low · Low
- Cross Frame Scripting (XFS)CAPEC-587High
- Credential Prompt ImpersonationCAPEC-654likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.