Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-16239· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

process_http_response in OpenConnect before 8.05 has a Buffer Overflow when a malicious server uses HTTP chunked encoding with crafted chunk

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 40/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.8% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: openconnect (Debian:10) 8.02-1+deb10u1; openconnect (Debian:12) 8.02-1.1; openconnect (Debian:8) 6.00-2+deb8u1.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to openconnect (Debian:10) 8.02-1+deb10u1; openconnect (Debian:12) 8.02-1.1; openconnect (Debian:8) 6.00-2+deb8u1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

process_http_response in OpenConnect before 8.05 has a Buffer Overflow when a malicious server uses HTTP chunked encoding with crafted chunk sizes.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 17, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
3.4% · 88th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

40

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 3.4%

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2019-16239

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
infradeadopenconnect
fedoraprojectfedora
debiandebian linux
canonicalubuntu linux
opensuseleap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux18.04
  • debian debian linux10.0
  • debian debian linux8.0
  • debian debian linux9.0
  • fedoraproject fedora29
  • fedoraproject fedora30
  • fedoraproject fedora31
  • infradead openconnectbefore 8.05
  • opensuse leap15.0
  • opensuse leap15.1

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:10openconnectbefore 8.02-1+deb10u18.02-1+deb10u1
Debian:12openconnectbefore 8.02-1.18.02-1.1
Debian:8openconnectbefore 6.00-2+deb8u16.00-2+deb8u1
Debian:9openconnectbefore 7.08-1+deb9u17.08-1+deb9u1
openSUSE:Leap 15.0openconnectbefore 7.08-lp150.5.3.17.08-lp150.5.3.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.1openconnectbefore 7.08-lp151.6.3.17.08-lp151.6.3.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4openconnectbefore 7.08-3.4.17.08-3.4.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15openconnectbefore 7.08-6.3.17.08-6.3.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2020-12823OpenConnect 8.09 has a buffer overflow, causing a denial of service (application crash) or possibly unspecified other impact, via crafted ce
    40Plan
  • CVE-2013-7098OpenConnect VPN client with GnuTLS before 5.02 contains a heap overflow if MTU is increased on reconnection.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2012-3291Heap-based buffer overflow in OpenConnect 3.18 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service via a crafted greeting banner.
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2010-3901OpenConnect before 2.25 does not properly validate X.509 certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary AnyConnec
    25Monitor
  • CVE-2020-12105OpenConnect through 8.08 mishandles negative return values from X509_check_ function calls, which might assist attackers in performing man-i
    24Monitor
  • CVE-2012-6128Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in http.c in OpenConnect before 4.08 allow remote VPN gateways to cause a denial of service (applicati
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:openconnect8.02-1.1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openconnect7.08-lp151.6.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1Package registry (OSV)
suse:openconnect7.08-6.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

c
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Fixed

c
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {  return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records