Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-1547· NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

ECDSA remote timing attack

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 66.8% of all records.
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: openssl (Alpine:v3.10) 1.1.1d-r0; openssl (Alpine:v3.11) 1.1.1d-r1; openssl3 (Alpine:v3.15) 1.1.1d-r1.
  • Mentioned 4 times in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).

Low priority for now. Upgrade to openssl (Alpine:v3.10) 1.1.1d-r0; openssl (Alpine:v3.11) 1.1.1d-r1; openssl3 (Alpine:v3.15) 1.1.1d-r1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of a large number of signatures where explicit parameters with no co-factor present are in use by an application using libcrypto. For the avoidance of doubt libssl is not vulnerable because explicit parameters are never used. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s).

MediumCVSS 4.7 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Sep 10, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.2% · 67th percentile
CWE
—

Report tools

JSON

Action score

18

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
18 / 40 · 4.7 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2019-1547

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Port scanning: 5 full scans a day (members only)
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Verify your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • openssl openssl1.0.2 and later · up to 1.0.2s inclusive
  • openssl openssl1.1.0 and later · up to 1.1.0k inclusive
  • openssl openssl1.1.1 and later · up to 1.1.1c inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c), Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k), Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s)affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.10opensslfrom 1.0.2 · before 1.1.1d-r01.1.1d-r0
Alpine:v3.11opensslfrom 1.0.2 · before 1.1.1d-r11.1.1d-r1
Alpine:v3.15openssl3before 1.1.1d-r11.1.1d-r1
Alpine:v3.7opensslfrom 1.0.2 · before 1.0.2t-r01.0.2t-r0
Debian:10opensslbefore 1.1.1d-0+deb10u11.1.1d-0+deb10u1
Debian:12opensslbefore 1.1.1d-11.1.1d-1
Debian:8opensslbefore 1.0.1t-1+deb8u121.0.1t-1+deb8u12
Debian:9opensslbefore 1.1.0l-1~deb9u11.1.0l-1~deb9u1
Debian:9openssl1.0before 1.0.2t-1~deb9u11.0.2t-1~deb9u1
openSUSE:Leap 15.0openssl-1_0_0before 1.0.2p-lp150.2.19.11.0.2p-lp150.2.19.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.0openssl-1_1before 1.1.0i-lp150.3.25.11.1.0i-lp150.3.25.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.1openssl-1_0_0before 1.0.2p-lp151.5.10.11.0.2p-lp151.5.10.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.1openssl-1_1before 1.1.0i-lp151.8.3.11.1.0i-lp151.8.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopensslbefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-debuginfobefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-debugsourcebefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-develbefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-libsbefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosopenssl-perlbefore 1:1.1.1c-15.el81:1.1.1c-15.el8
Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6jbcs-httpd24-aprbefore 0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el60:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6
Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6jbcs-httpd24-apr-debuginfobefore 0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el60:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6
Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6jbcs-httpd24-apr-develbefore 0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el60:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6
Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6jbcs-httpd24-brotlibefore 0:1.0.6-21.jbcs.el60:1.0.6-21.jbcs.el6

+58

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week
  • CVE-2016-2108The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denia
    62This week
  • CVE-2016-6309statem/statem.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0a does not consider memory-block movement after a realloc call, which allows remote attackers to cause a den
    60This week
  • CVE-2022-3786X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow
    58Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:openssl1.1.1d-r0 · Alpine:v3.10Package registry (OSV)
alpine:openssl31.1.1d-r1 · Alpine:v3.15Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl1.1.1d-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl1.01.0.2t-1~deb9u1 · Debian:9Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-1_0_01.0.2p-lp150.2.19.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-1_11.1.0i-lp151.8.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-apr0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-apr-debuginfo0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-apr-devel0:1.6.3-86.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-brotli0:1.0.6-21.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-brotli-debuginfo0:1.0.6-21.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-brotli-devel0:1.0.6-21.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-debuginfo0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-devel0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-manual0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-selinux0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:jbcs-httpd24-httpd-tools0:2.4.37-52.jbcs.el6 · Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el6Package registry (OSV)
suse:compat-openssl0980.9.8j-106.15.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl0.9.8j-0.106.25.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-1_0_01.0.2p-3.11.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-1_11.1.0i-14.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP1Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl11.0.1g-0.58.21.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11-SECURITYPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)

Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.

All national notices →

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

—

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records