Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-14864· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Ansible, versions 2.9.x before 2.9.1, 2.8.x before 2.8.7 and Ansible versions 2.7.x before 2.7.15, is not respecting the flag no_log set it

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 78.8% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: ansible (Alpine:v3.10) 2.8.8-r0; ansible (Alpine:v3.9) 2.7.16-r0; ansible (Debian:10) 2.7.7+dfsg-1+deb10u1.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to ansible (Alpine:v3.10) 2.8.8-r0; ansible (Alpine:v3.9) 2.7.16-r0; ansible (Debian:10) 2.7.7+dfsg-1+deb10u1 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Ansible, versions 2.9.x before 2.9.1, 2.8.x before 2.8.7 and Ansible versions 2.7.x before 2.7.15, is not respecting the flag no_log set it to True when Sumologic and Splunk callback plugins are used send tasks results events to collectors. This would discloses and collects any sensitive data.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jan 2, 2020
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.9% · 79th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

27

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 1.9%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
6.5
CNA · redhat
5.7
0.8 point gap

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2019-14864

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Port scanning: 5 full scans a day (members only)
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Verify your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for redhat records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
redhatansible
redhatansible tower
redhatceph storage
redhatcloudforms management engine
redhatenterprise linux
debiandebian linux
opensusebackports sle
opensuseleap

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux10.0
  • opensuse backports sle15.0
  • opensuse leap15.1
  • redhat ansible2.7.0 and later · before 2.7.15
  • redhat ansible2.8.0 and later · before 2.8.7
  • redhat ansible2.9.0 and later · before 2.9.1
  • redhat ansible tower3.0
  • redhat ceph storage3.0
  • redhat cloudforms management engine5.0
  • redhat enterprise linux6.0
  • redhat enterprise linux7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux8.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Red Hat Ansible

    • Ansible versions 2.9.x before 2.9.1, Ansible versions 2.8.x before 2.8.7, Ansible versions 2.7.x before 2.7.15affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.10ansiblefrom 2.7.0 · before 2.8.8-r02.8.8-r0
Alpine:v3.9ansiblefrom 2.7.0 · before 2.7.16-r02.7.16-r0
Debian:10ansiblebefore 2.7.7+dfsg-1+deb10u12.7.7+dfsg-1+deb10u1
Debian:12ansiblebefore 2.9.2+dfsg-12.9.2+dfsg-1
openSUSE:Leap 15.1ansiblebefore 2.9.6-lp151.2.7.12.9.6-lp151.2.7.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedansible-10before 10.6.0-1.110.6.0-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedansible-11before 11.11.0-1.111.11.0-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedansible-12before 12.2.0-1.112.2.0-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedansible-13before 13.7.0-1.113.7.0-1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedansible-9before 9.8.0-1.19.8.0-1.1
PyPIansiblefrom 2.7.0 · before 2.7.152.7.15
PyPIansiblefrom 2.7.0a1 · before 2.7.152.7.15
PyPIansiblefrom 2.8.0 · before 2.8.72.8.7
PyPIansiblefrom 2.8.0a1 · before 2.8.72.8.7
PyPIansiblefrom 2.9.0 · before 2.9.12.9.1
PyPIansiblefrom 2.9.0a1 · before 2.9.12.9.1
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.7::el7ansiblebefore 0:2.7.15-1.el7ae0:2.7.15-1.el7ae
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.8::el7ansiblebefore 0:2.8.7-1.el7ae0:2.8.7-1.el7ae
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.8::el8ansiblebefore 0:2.8.7-1.el8ae0:2.8.7-1.el8ae
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.9::el7ansiblebefore 0:2.9.1-1.el70:2.9.1-1.el7
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.9::el7ansible-testbefore 0:2.9.1-1.el70:2.9.1-1.el7
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.9::el8ansiblebefore 0:2.9.1-1.el80:2.9.1-1.el8
Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.9::el8ansible-testbefore 0:2.9.1-1.el80:2.9.1-1.el8
SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP1ansiblebefore 2.9.6-bp151.3.6.12.9.6-bp151.3.6.1

Same product

redhat: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-4678The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.6.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrar
    41Plan
  • CVE-2014-4657The safe_eval function in Ansible before 1.5.4 does not properly restrict the code subset, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrar
    40Plan
  • CVE-2014-4967Multiple argument injection vulnerabilities in Ansible before 1.6.7 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to
    40Plan
  • CVE-2014-4966Ansible before 1.6.7 does not prevent inventory data with "{{" and "lookup" substrings, and does not prevent remote data with "{{" substring
    40Plan
  • CVE-2017-7550A flaw was found in the way Ansible (2.3.x before 2.3.3, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1) passed certain parameters to the jenkins_plugin module.
    40Plan
  • CVE-2016-8628Ansible before version 2.2.0 fails to properly sanitize fact variables sent from the Ansible controller.
    37Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:ansible2.8.8-r0 · Alpine:v3.10Package registry (OSV)
debian:ansible2.9.2+dfsg-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible2.9.6-lp151.2.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.1Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible-1010.6.0-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible-1111.11.0-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible-1212.2.0-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible-1313.7.0-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
opensuse:ansible-99.8.0-1.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
PyPI:ansible2.7.15Package registry (OSV)
PyPI:ansible2.8.7Package registry (OSV)
PyPI:ansible2.9.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ansible0:2.7.15-1.el7ae · Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.7::el7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:ansible-test0:2.9.1-1.el7 · Red Hat:ansible_engine:2.9::el7Package registry (OSV)
suse:ansible2.9.6-bp151.3.6.1 · SUSE:Package Hub 15 SP1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-117 · Improper Output Neutralization for Logs

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Show all references (4 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records