Out of bound memory access while processing TZ command handler due to improper input validation on response length received from user in Sna
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Out of bound memory access while processing TZ command handler due to improper input validation on response length received from user in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8998, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM845, SDM850, SXR2130
- Published
- Apr 16, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 9th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
31
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| qualcomm | apq8009 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8009_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8009 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8009 |
| qualcomm | apq8098 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:apq8098_firmware |
| qualcomm | apq8098 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:apq8098 |
| qualcomm | mdm9150 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:mdm9150_firmware |
| qualcomm | mdm9150 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:mdm9150 |
| qualcomm | mdm9607 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:mdm9607_firmware |
| qualcomm | mdm9607 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:mdm9607 |
| qualcomm | mdm9650 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:mdm9650_firmware |
| qualcomm | mdm9650 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:mdm9650 |
| qualcomm | msm8905 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:qualcomm:msm8905_firmware |
| qualcomm | msm8905 | cpe:2.3:h:qualcomm:msm8905 |
and 20 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- qualcomm apq8009 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm apq8098 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm mdm9150 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm mdm9607 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm mdm9650 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8905 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8909 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm msm8998 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sda660 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sda845 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm630 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm636 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm660 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm845 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sdm850 firmwareall versions
- qualcomm sxr2130 firmwareall versions
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (qualcomm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Netwo
- APQ8009, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8998, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM845, SDM850, SXR2130affected
Same product
qualcomm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-11261Memory corruption due to improper check to return error when user application requests memory allocation of a huge size in Snapdragon Auto, KEV61This week
- CVE-2021-1905Possible use after free due to improper handling of memory mapping of multiple processes simultaneously.KEV61This week
- CVE-2021-1906Improper handling of address deregistration on failure can lead to new GPU address allocation failure.KEV52Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14001Apr 16, 2020 · Wrong public key usage from existing oem_keystore for hash generation in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT31Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2019-14007Apr 16, 2020 · Due to the use of non-time-constant comparison functions there is issue in timing side channels which can be used as a potential side channe22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2019-14011Apr 16, 2020 · Multiple Read overflows issue due to improper length check while decoding 3G attach accept/ SMS/ pdn connection reject/ esm data transport/ 36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.